Gbachelier: /* Abstract */

2014-12-08T17:55:55Z

‎Abstract

Gbachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Kevin McGuire: A Turing Test for Generative Art. In: Generative Art 2011, 268-274. == DOI == == Abstract == When we produce generative alg…“

2014-12-08T17:55:30Z

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Kevin McGuire: A Turing Test for Generative Art. In: Generative Art 2011, 268-274. == DOI == == Abstract == When we produce generative alg…“

Neue Seite

== Reference ==
Kevin McGuire: A Turing Test for Generative Art. In: Generative Art 2011, 268-274.

== DOI ==

== Abstract ==
When we produce generative algorithms whose output closely matches the
style of a particular architect [1] or artist, what exactly is it that we
think we are doing? Do we believe we are simply mimicking the
architect, producing shallow results that have the surface qualities of
the architect but no substance, much as a parrot might speak words [2]
but there is no meaning"� Is it "mannered"� Or do we believe we are
somehow capturing something deeper, a kind of partial working copy of
the architect's brain and their creative essence?

How can we even begin to have this discussion?

In the area of Artificial Intelligence, there is the concept of the Turing
Test [3] which allows us to discuss when we believe a computer
program is behaving "intelligently". ��The Turing Test is not a real test, but
rather a rhetorical framework in which one can disentangle the
discussion around artificial intelligence.

We can apply a similar philosophical framework to the problem of
generative art. By applying an equivalent to the Turing Test, we can
discuss topics like mimicry, forgery, functional correctness, topological
similarity, branding, signature style, whether a machine can be creative,
and whether a machine can create art.

== Extended Abstract ==

== Bibtex ==

== Used References ==
no c&p

== Links ==
=== Full Text ===
http://www.generativeart.com/GA2011/kevin.pdf

[[intern file]]

=== Sonstige Links ===

@@ Zeile 13: / Zeile 13: @@
 architect, producing shallow results that have the surface qualities of
 the architect but no substance, much as a parrot might speak words [2]
-but there is no meaning"� Is it "mannered"� Or do we believe we are
+but there is no meaning" Is it "mannered" Or do we believe we are
 somehow capturing something deeper, a kind of partial working copy of
 the architect's brain and their creative essence?
@@ Zeile 21: / Zeile 21: @@
 In the area of Artificial Intelligence, there is the concept of the Turing
 Test [3] which allows us to discuss when we believe a computer
-program is behaving "intelligently". ��The Turing Test is not a real test, but
+program is behaving "intelligently". The Turing Test is not a real test, but
 rather a rhetorical framework in which one can disentangle the
 discussion around artificial intelligence.

A Turing Test for Generative Art - Versionsgeschichte

Gbachelier: /* Abstract */

Gbachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Kevin McGuire: A Turing Test for Generative Art. In: Generative Art 2011, 268-274. == DOI == == Abstract == When we produce generative alg…“