http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=An_Iconography_of_Reason_and_Roses 2026-04-18T13:44:45Z Versionsgeschichte dieser Seite in de_evolutionary_art_org MediaWiki 1.27.4 http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=An_Iconography_of_Reason_and_Roses&diff=4288&oldid=prev 2015-02-01T13:34:35Z

<p>Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Sarah Stengle: <a href="/index.php?title=An_Iconography_of_Reason_and_Roses" title="An Iconography of Reason and Roses">An Iconography of Reason and Roses</a>. In: <a href="/index.php?title=Bridges_2000" title="Bridges 2000">Bridges 2000</a>. Pages 161–168 == DOI == == Abstract == The author uses mathe…“</p> <p><b>Neue Seite</b></p><div><br /> == Reference ==<br /> Sarah Stengle: [[An Iconography of Reason and Roses]]. In: [[Bridges 2000]]. Pages 161–168 <br /> <br /> == DOI ==<br /> <br /> == Abstract ==<br /> The author uses mathematical elements from old textbooks and engineering manuals in her artwork. This paper is a<br /> semiotic analysis of the mathematical imagery used. Semiotics, or the study of signs, is central to the concerns of<br /> twentieth century art. While most bridges between mathematics and art start by using mathematical· principles to<br /> determine or augment an image, the author argues that her work uses artistic principles to augment the perception of<br /> the mathematics. Both approaches represent legitimate bridges between the disciplines, even if the former is more<br /> familiar than the latter. Many of the beautiful images and objects generated by the application of mathematics to art-<br /> work are visually compelling, but are conceptually removed from the critical dialogue associated with fine art. The<br /> author, who is an artist, believes that while the work does not break new ground mathematically, it does connect the<br /> disciplines of mathematics and art by providing an original examination of the semiotics of both disciplines.<br /> <br /> == Extended Abstract ==<br /> <br /> == Bibtex == <br /> <br /> == Used References ==<br /> [1] Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ninth edition, Vol. XIX, pp. 788-809. 1894.<br /> <br /> [2] G. Greenfield and S. Stengle, Magic Squares as Mathematical Palimpsest, First Interdisciplinary<br /> Conference, International Society of the Arts, Mathematics and Architecture. N.Friedman and J. Barallo<br /> (eds.), The University of Basque Country, pp. 219-226. 1999.<br /> <br /> [3] Spence, Woltman &amp; GIMPS, 22976221_1, downloaded in August, 1998 from<br /> <br /> http:Uwwwuun eduiresearchlprimesJ1~st hunl, a website maintained by the University of Tennessee at<br /> Martin.<br /> <br /> [4] Academischen Verein Hutte, Des Ingenieurs Taschenbuch, Verlag von Wilhelm Ernst &amp; Sons, Berlin,<br /> 1896.<br /> <br /> [5] Pol. Redoute (1759-1860), Redoute Roses Giftwrap, Dover. 1990.<br /> <br /> [6] William Shakespeare, Sonnets, edited by H. E. Rollins, Harvard University. Appleton-Century-Crofts,<br /> Inc. New York, Sonnet 54, pg. 27, 1951.<br /> <br /> [7] D. Davis, The Nature and Power of Mathematics, University of Princeton Press. 1993.<br /> <br /> [8] J. Tschichold, The Form of the Book, Hartely and Marks, pp. 11, 1991.<br /> <br /> <br /> == Links ==<br /> === Full Text === <br /> http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-161.pdf<br /> <br /> [[intern file]]<br /> <br /> === Sonstige Links ===<br /> http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-161.html</div>

Gbachelier