Gubachelier: /* Bibtex */

2015-11-12T12:09:34Z

‎Bibtex

Gubachelier am 11. November 2015 um 12:07 Uhr

2015-11-11T12:07:05Z

Gbachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Simon Colton, Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Syst…“

2015-01-27T20:36:59Z

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Simon Colton, Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Syst…“

Neue Seite

== Reference ==
[[Simon Colton]], Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: [[Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2014 ICCC 2014]].

== DOI ==

== Abstract ==
Determining conclusively whether a new version of software
creatively exceeds a previous version or a third party sys-
tem is difficult, yet very important for scientific approaches
in Computational Creativity research. We argue that software
product and process need to be assessed simultaneously in
assessing progress, and we introduce a diagrammatic formal-
ism which exposes various timelines of creative acts in the
construction and execution of successive versions of artefact-
generating software. The formalism enables estimations of
progress or regress from system to system by comparing their
diagrams and assessing changes in quality, quantity and va-
riety of creative acts undertaken; audience perception of be-
haviours; and the quality of artefacts produced. We present
a case study in the building of evolutionary art systems, and
we use the formalism to highlight various issues in measuring
progress in the building of creative systems.

== Extended Abstract ==

== Bibtex ==

== Used References ==
Abrial, J.-R. 1996 The B-Book – Assigning Programs to Meanings.
Cambridge University Press.

Abrial, J.-R. 2010. Modeling in Event-B – System and Software
Engineering. Cambridge University Press.

al-Rifaie, M and Bishop, M. 2012. Weak vs. strong Computational
Creativity, computing, philosophy and the question of bio-machine
hybrids. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Computing and
Philosophy.

Charnley, J.; Pease, A.; and Colton, S. 2012. On the notion of
framing in Computational Creativity. In Proceedings of the Inter-
national Conference on Computational Creativity.

Colton, S., and Wiggins, G. 2012. Computational Creativity: The
final frontier? In Proceedings of the European Conference on AI.

Colton, S.; Cook, M.; Hepworth, R.; and Pease, A. 2014. On acid
drops and teardrops: Observer issues in Computational Creativity.
In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on AI and Philosophy.

Colton, S.; Goodwin, J.; and Veale, T. 2012. Full-FACE po-
etry generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference
on Computational Creativity.

Colton, S.; Pease, A.; and Charnley, J. 2011. Computational Cre-
ativity Theory: The FACE and IDEA descriptive models. In Pro-
ceedings of the Int. Conference on Computational Creativity.

Colton, S. 2001. Experiments in meta-theory formation. In Pro-
ceedings of the AISB’01 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts
and Science.

Colton, S. 2002. Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathemat-
ics. Springer.

Colton, S. 2008a. Automatic invention of fitness functions with
application to scene generation. In Proceedings of EvoMusArt.

Colton, S. 2008b. Creativity versus the perception of creativity in
computational systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Sym-
posium on Creative Intelligent Systems.

Colton, S. 2012. Evolving a library of artistic scene descriptors. In
Proceedings of EvoMusArt.

Colton, S. 2012b. The Painting Fool: Stories from building an
automated painter. In McCormack, J., and d’Inverno, M., eds.,
Computers and Creativity. Springer.

Gabriel, R. P. and Goldman, R. 2000. Mob software: The erotic
life of code. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Object-
Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications.

Gabriel, R. P. and Goldman R. 2006. Conscientious software. In
ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 41.

Gallie, W. 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of
the Aristotelian Society 56.

Girault, C. and Valk, R. 2003. Petri nets for systems engineerings
– a guide to modeling, verification, and applications. Springer.
Jensen, K. and Kristensen, L. M. 2009. Coloured Petri Nets -
Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems. Springer.

Jones, C. B. 1990. Systematic software development using VDM.
Prentice Hall.

Jordanous, A. 2012. A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating
Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on
What it is to be Creative. Cognitive Computation 4(3).

Jordanous, A. 2012. Evaluating Computational Creativity: A Stan-
dardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems and its Appli-
cation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sussex.

Lenat, D. 1976. AM: An Artificial Intelligence approach to discov-
ery in mathematics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Li, Y.; Hu, C.; Minku, L.; and Zuo, H. 2013. Learning aesthetic
judgements in evolutionary art systems. GPEM 14(3).

Machado, P., and Cardoso, A. 2002. All the truth about NEvAr.
Applied Intelligence 16(2).

Pearce, M. T. and Wiggins, G. A. 2001. Towards a Framework
for the Evaluation of Machine Composition. In Proceedings of the
AISB’01 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science.

Pease, A., and Colton, S. 2011. Computational Creativity Theory:
Inspirations behind the FACE and IDEA models. In Proceedings
of the International Conference on Computational Creativity.

Pease, A., and Colton, S. 2012. On impact and evaluation in Com-
putational Creativity: A discussion of the Turing test and an alter-
native proposal. In Proceedings of the AISB symposium on AI and
Philosophy.

Pereira, F.; Gerv ́as, P.; and Cardoso, A. 2005. Experiments with
assessment of creative systems: An application of Ritchie’s criteria.
In Proceedings of the IJCAI Computational Creativity Workshop.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity
to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17.

Romero, J., and Machado, P., eds. 2007. The Art of Artificial
Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and Music. Springer.
Wiggins, G. A. 2006. Searching for computational creativity. New
Generation Computing 24(3).

Said, M. Y., Butler, M. J., and Snook, C. F. 2009. Language and
tool support for class and state machine refinement in UML-B. In
Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Formal Methods.

Spivey, M. 1992. The Z notation: A reference manual. Prentice
Hall.

== Links ==
=== Full Text ===
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/06//8.4_Colton.pdf

[[intern file]]

=== Sonstige Links ===

@@ Zeile 30: / Zeile 30: @@
   author = {Simon Colton, Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano},
   title = {Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems},
-  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
+  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
   series = {ICCC2014},
   year = {2014},

@@ Zeile 2: / Zeile 2: @@
 == Reference ==
-[[Simon Colton]], Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: [[Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2014 ICCC 2014]].
+[[Simon Colton]], Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: [[Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2014 ICCC 2014]], 137-145.
 == DOI ==
@@ Zeile 27: / Zeile 27: @@
 == Bibtex ==
 == Used References ==

Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Systems - Versionsgeschichte

Gubachelier: /* Bibtex */

Gubachelier am 11. November 2015 um 12:07 Uhr

Gbachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Simon Colton, Alison Pease, Joe Corneli, Michael Cook and Maria Teresa Llano: Assessing Progress in Building Autonomously Creative Syst…“