Automated collage generation — with intent - Versionsgeschichte

Gubachelier am 14. November 2015 um 11:15 Uhr

2015-11-14T11:15:55Z

Gbachelier: /* Full Text */

2015-01-31T14:52:27Z

‎Full Text

Gbachelier am 31. Januar 2015 um 14:45 Uhr

2015-01-31T14:45:35Z

Gbachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Krzeczkowska, A., El-Hage, J., Colton, S., Clark, S.: Automated collage generation — with intent. In: Ventura, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedin…“

2014-11-02T20:18:14Z

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Krzeczkowska, A., El-Hage, J., Colton, S., Clark, S.: Automated collage generation — with intent. In: Ventura, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedin…“

Neue Seite

== Reference ==
Krzeczkowska, A., El-Hage, J., Colton, S., Clark, S.: Automated collage generation — with intent. In: Ventura, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 36–40 (2010).

== DOI ==

== Abstract ==
One reason why software undertaking creative tasks might be perceived of as
uncreative is its lack of overall purpose or intent. In computational creativity
projects, while some skillful aspects may be undertaken by the computer, there
is usually a person driving the process, by making decisions with regard to
the intent of the artefact being produced. Such human intervention can take
different forms, for instance via the supplying of background information in
scientific discovery tasks, or making choices during an evolutionary art session.
We are interested in whether a notion of purpose could be projected onto The
Painting Fool, an automated painter we hope will one day be taken seriously
as a creative artist in its own right [3, 5]. Starting with the maxim that good
art makes you think, we have enabled The Painting Fool to produce visual art
specifically to invite the viewer to interpret the pieces in the context of the world
around them, i.e., to make a point about a current aspect of society. However,
we do not prescribe what aspect of modern life it should depict, nor do we
describe the art materials – in this case digital images – it should use. Hence,
we effectively opt out of specifying a purpose for any individual piece of art. As
described in section 2, the software starts with an instruction to access sources
of news articles at regular intervals. Then, via text manipulation, text analysis,
image retrieval, image manipulation, scene construction and non-photorealistic
rendering techniques, the system produces a collage which depicts a particular
news story. This is initial work, and more effort is needed to produce collages
of more aesthetic and semantic value. We present some preliminary results in
section 3, including some illustrative examples and feedback from viewers of the
collages produced. In section 4, we describe the next stages for this project.

== Extended Abstract ==

== Bibtex ==

== Used References ==
1. S Brin and L Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine.
Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30:1–7, 1998.

2. S Colton. Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathematics. Springer, 2001.

3. S Colton. Creativity versus the perception of creativity in computational systems.
In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Creative Systems, 2008.

4. S Colton. Experiments in constraint-based automated scene generation. In Proceed-
ings of the 5th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, 2008.

5. S Colton, M Valstar, and M Pantic. Emotionally aware automated portrait painting.
In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Digital Interactive Media in Ent. & Arts, 2008.

6. J El-Hage. Linguistic analysis for The Painting Fool. Master’s thesis, The Computer
Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK, 2009.

7. A Krzeczkowska. Automated collage generation from text. Master’s thesis, Depart-
ment of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK, 2009.

8. R Mihalcea and P Tarau. TextRank: Bringing order into texts. In Proceedings of
the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2004.

9. S Muggleton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing 13, 2005.

== Links ==
=== Full Text ===
http://wwwhomes.doc.ic.ac.uk/~sgc/papers/krzeczkowska_cc10.pdf

[[intern file]]

=== Sonstige Links ===

@@ Zeile 35: / Zeile 35: @@
 == Bibtex ==
 == Used References ==
@@ Zeile 65: / Zeile 79: @@
 == Links ==
 === Full Text ===
 http://wwwhomes.doc.ic.ac.uk/~sgc/papers/krzeczkowska_cc10.pdf
 [[intern file]]
 === Sonstige Links ===

@@ Zeile 2: / Zeile 2: @@
 == Reference ==
-Krzeczkowska, A., El-Hage, J., Colton, S., Clark, S.: Automated collage generation — with intent. In: Ventura, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 36–40 (2010).
+Anna Krzeczkowska, Jad El-Hage, [[Simon Colton]], Stephen Clark: [[Automated collage generation — with intent]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2010 ICCC 2010]]. 36-40. (2010)
 == DOI ==
@@ Zeile 61: / Zeile 61: @@
 . S Muggleton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing 13, 2005.