Gubachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Referenz == Cela-Conde, C.J., Agnati, L., Huston, J.P., Mora, F., Nadal, M.: The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in neurobiology …“

2016-06-27T14:06:08Z

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Referenz == Cela-Conde, C.J., Agnati, L., Huston, J.P., Mora, F., Nadal, M.: The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in neurobiology …“

Neue Seite

== Referenz ==
Cela-Conde, C.J., Agnati, L., Huston, J.P., Mora, F., Nadal, M.: The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in neurobiology 94(1) (2011) 39-48

== DOI ==
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.003

== Abstract ==
The study of the cognitive and neural underpinnings of aesthetic appreciation by means of neuroimaging techniques has yielded a wealth of fascinating information. Although the results of these studies have been somewhat divergent, here we provide an integrative view of the early approaches, which identified some of the core mechanisms involved in aesthetic preference. Then, a number of more specific issues under the perspective of recent work are addressed. Finally, we propose a framework to accommodate these findings and we explore future prospects for the emerging field of neuroaesthetics.

== Extended Abstract ==

== Bibtex ==
@article{CelaConde201139,
title = "The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation ",
journal = "Progress in Neurobiology ",
volume = "94",
number = "1",
pages = "39 - 48",
year = "2011",
note = "",
issn = "0301-0082",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.003",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008211000414 http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=The_neural_foundations_of_aesthetic_appreciation",
author = "Camilo J. Cela-Conde and Luigi Agnati and Joseph P. Huston and Francisco Mora and Marcos Nadal",
keywords = "Neuroaesthetics",
keywords = "Aesthetic appreciation",
keywords = "Neuroimaging",
keywords = "MEG",
keywords = "fMRI "
}

== Used References ==
Adolphs, R., Spezio, M., 2006. Role of the amygdala in processing visual social
stimuli. Prog. Brain Res. 156, 363–378.

Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., 1999. Preferences for visual stimuli following amygdala
damage. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 610–616.

Barron, F., Welsh, G.S., 1952. Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality
style: its measurement by a figure preference test. J. Psychol. 33, 199–203.

Ba¨zner, H., Hennerici, M., 2006. Stroke in painters. In: Rose, F.C. (Ed.), The
Neurobiology of Painting. International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 74. Academic
Press, San Diego, pp. 165–191.

Berkowitz, A.L., Ansari, D., 2010. Expertise-related deactivation of the right temporoparietal
junction during musical improvisation. Neuroimage 49, 712–719.

Berlyne, D.E., 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New
York.

Berlyne, D.E., 1974. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an
Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation,
Washington, DC.

Blood, A.J., Zatorre, R.J., 2001. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate
with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11818–11823.

Blood, A.J., Zatorre, R.J., Bermudez, P., Evans, A.C., 1999. Emotional responses to
pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain
regions. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 382–387.

Boeve, B.F., Geda, Y.E., 2001. Polka music and semantic dementia. Neurology 57,
1485.

Bogousslavsky, J., 2005. Artistic creativity, style and brain disorders. Eur. Neurol. 54,
103–111.

Brown, S., Dissanayake, E., 2009. The arts are more than aesthetics: neuroaesthetics
as narrow aesthetics. In: Skov, M., Vartanian, O. (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics. Baywood,
Amityville, pp. 43–57.

Busey, T.A., Vanderkolk, J.R., 2005. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for
configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vis. Res. 45, 431–448.

Calvo-Merino, B., Ehrenberg, S., Leung, D., Haggard, P., 2010a. Experts see it all:
configural effects in action observation. Psychol. Res. 74, 400–406.

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Gre` zes, J., Passingham, R.E., Haggard, P., 2005. Action
observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers.
Cereb. Cortex 15, 1243–1249.

Calvo-Merino, B., Urgesi, C., Orgs, G., Aglioti, S.M., Haggard, P., 2010b. Extrastriate
body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 204,
447–456.

Cela-Conde, C.J., Marty, C.J., 1997. Mind architecture and brain architecture. On the
claims made for a general synthetic model of consciousness. Biol. Philos. 12,
327–340.

Cela-Conde, C.J., Marty, G., Maestu´ , F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Ferna´ ndez, A., Roca, M.,
Rossello´ , J., Quesney, F., 2004. Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human
visual aesthetic perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 6321–6325.

Cela-Conde, C.J., Marty, G., Munar, E., Nadal, M., Burges, L., 2002. The ‘‘Style Scheme’’
grounds artistic experience. Percept. Mot. Skills 95, 91–100.

Chatterjee, A., 2004a. The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia
42, 1568–1583.

Chatterjee, A., 2004b. Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics.
Bull. Psychol. Arts 4, 55–60.

Chatterjee, A., 2006. The neuropsychology of visual art: conferring capacity. Int. Rev.
Neurobiol. 74, 39–49.

Chatterjee, A., 2011. Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23,
53–62.

Christoff, K., Gabrieli, J.D.E., 2000. The frontopolar cortex and human cognition:
evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal
cortex. Psychobiology 28, 168–186.

Crick, F., Koch, C., 1990. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Semin
Neurosci 2, 263–275.

Cross, E.S., de C. Hamilton, A.F., Grafton, S.T., 2006. Building a motor simulation de
novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31, 1257–1267.

Cupchik, G.C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., Mikulis, D.J., 2009. Viewing artworks:
contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic
experience. Brain Cogn. 70, 84–91.

Cupchik, G.C., Winston, A.S., Herz, R.S., 1992. Judgements of similarity and difference
between paintings. Vis. Arts Res. 14, 37–50.

Danto, A.C., 1997. After the End of Art. Contemporary Art and the Pale of History.
Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Diamond, R., Carey, S., 1986. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of
expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 107–117.

Dissanayake, E., 1992. Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes from and Why. Free
Press, New York.

Eysenck, H.J., 1940. The ‘general factor’ in aesthetic judgements. Br. J. Psychol. 31,
94–102.

Fairhall, S.L., Ishai, A., 2008. Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art
compositions. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 923–932.

Fodor, J.A., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Geroldi, C., Metitieri, T., Binetti, G., Zanetti, O., Trabucchi, M., Frisoni, G.B., 2000. Pop
music and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 55, 1935–1936.

Gosselin, N., Peretz, I., Johnsen, E., Adolphs, R., 2007. Amygdala damage impairs
emotion recognition from music. Neuropsychologia 45, 236–244.

Griffiths, T.D., Warren, J.D., Dean, J.L., Howard, D., 2004. ‘‘When the feeling’s gone’’: a
selective loss of musical emotion. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75, 341–345.

Halpern, A.R., Ly, J., Elkin-Frankston, S., O’Connor, M.G., 2008. ‘‘I know what I like’’:
stability of aesthetic preference in Alzheimer’s patients. Brain Cogn. 66, 65–72.

Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I., 2000. The distributed human neural system
for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 223–233.

Hekkert, P., van Wieringen, P.C.W., 1996. Beauty in the eye of the expert and
nonexpert beholders: a study in the appraisal of art. Am. J. Psychol. 109, 389–
407.
Ishai, A., Fairhall, S.L., Pepperell, R., 2007. Perception, memory and aesthetics of
indeterminate art. Brain Res. Bull. 73, 314–324.

Jacobs, R.H.A.H., Renken, R., Cornelissen, F.W., 2006. Left Amygdalar Selectivity in
Judging for Aesthetics. Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, Groningen.

Jacobsen, T., 2010. Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences
in aesthetic appreciation. J. Anat. 216, 184–191.

Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Ko¨ hler, M., Schro¨ ger, E., 2004. A primacy of beauty: the
aesthetics of things. Psychol. Rep. 94, 1253–1260.

Jacobsen, T., Ho¨ fel, L., 2003. Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: behavioral
and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics.
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3, 289–299.

Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R.I., Ho¨ fel, L., von Cramon, D.Y., 2006. Brain correlates of
aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29, 276–285.

Kawabata, H., Zeki, S., 2004. Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1699–
1705.

Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M.S., Nygaard, N., 2009a. Brain correlates of aesthetic
expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 69, 306–315.

Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme,O., Christensen, M.S., Zeki, S., 2009b.Modulation of aesthetic
value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44, 1125–1132.

Looft, W.R., Baranowski, M., 1971. An analysis of five measures of sensation seeking
and preference for complexity. J. Gen. Psychol. 85, 307–313.

Marty, G., Cela Conde, C.J., Munar, E., Rossello´ , J., Roca, M., Escudero, J.T., 2003.
Dimensiones factoriales de la experiencia este´ tica. Psicothema 14, 478–483.

Massey, I., 2009. The Neural Imagination. Aesthetic and Neuroscientific Approaches
to the Arts. University of Texas Press, Austin.

Miller, B.L., Hou, C.E., 2004. Portraits of artists. Emergence of visual creativity in
dementia. Arch. Neurol. 61, 842–844.

Miller, G., 2000. The Mating Mind. How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of
Human Nature. Doubleday, London.

Miller, G.F., 2001. Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity
as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull.
Psychol. Arts 2, 20–25.

Mu¨ ller, M., Ho¨ fel, L., Brattico, E., Jacobsen, T., 2009. Electrophysiological correlates of
aesthetic music processing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169, 355–358.

Munsinger, H., Kessen, W., 1964. Uncertainty, structure, and preference. Psychol.
Monogr.: Gen. Appl. 78, 1–24.

Nadal, M., Pearce, M.T. 2011. The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics conference: prospects
and pitfalls for an emerging field. Brain Cogn., in press.

Nadal, M., Marty, G., Munar, E., 2006. The search for objective measures of aesthetic
judgment: the case of memory traces. Emp. Stud. Arts 24, 95–106.

Nadal, M., Munar, E., Capo´ , M.A., Rossello´ , J., Cela-Conde, C.J., 2008. Towards a
framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spat.
Vis. 21, 379–396.

Nodine, C.F., Locher, P.J., Krupinski, E.A., 1993. The role of formal art training on
perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo 26, 219–227.

Northoff, G., Bermpohl, F., 2004. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends
Cogn. Sci. 8, 102–107.

Orgs, G., Dombrowski, J.-H., Heil, M., Jansen-Osmann, P., 2008. Expertise in dance
modulates alpha/beta event-related desynchronization during action observation.
Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 3380–3384.

Pickford, R.W., 1955. Factorial studies of aesthetic judgments. In: Roback, A.A.
(Ed.), Present-Day Psychology. Philosophical Library, New York, pp. 913–
929.

Poldrack, R.A., 2006. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 59–63.

Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W., 1999. The science of art: a neurological theory of
aesthetic experience. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 15–51.

Raymond, J., Narayanan, S., 2009. Interactions of attention, emotion and motivation.
Prog. Brain Res. 176, 293–308.

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P., 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic
pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Rev. 8, 364–382.

Rossion, B., Curran, T., 2010. Visual expertise with pictures of cars correlates with RT
magnitude of the car inversion effect. Perception 39, 173–183.

Seifert, L.S., 1992. Experimental aesthetics: implications for aesthetic education of
naive art observers. J. Psychol. 126, 73–78.

Sellal, F., Andriantseheno, M., Vercueil, L., Hirsch, E., Kahane, P., Pellat, J., 2003.

Dramatic changes in artistic preference after left temporal lobectomy. Epilepsy
Behav. 4, 449–450.

Shulman, R.G., Hyder, F., Rothman, D.L., 2009. Baseline brain energy supports the
state of consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 11096–11101.

Skov, M., Vartanian, O., 2009. Neuroaesthetics. Baywood Publishing, Amityville.

Tallis, R., 2008a. The limitations of a neurological approach to art. Lancet 372, 19–
20.

Tallis, R., 2008b. The neuroscience delusion. Times Lit. Suppl. April .

Urgesi, C., Calvo-Merino, B., Haggard, P., Aglioti, S.M., 2007. Transcranial magnetic
stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. J. Neurosci.
27, 8023–8030.

Vartanian, O., Goel, V., 2004. Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for
paintings. Neuroreport 15, 893–897.

Vogt, S., Magnussen, S., 2007. Expertise in pictorial perception: eye-movement
patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception 36, 91–100.

Von der Malsburg, C., 1981. The Correlation Theory of Brain Function. Dept. of
Neurobiology, Max-Plank-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Go¨ ttingen,
Germany.

von der Malsburg, C., Schneider, W., 1986. A neural cocktail-party. Biol. Cybern. 54,
29–40.

Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., Catty, S., 2006. Prototypes are
attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychol. Sci. 17, 799–806.

Winston, A.S., Cupchik, G.C., 1992. The evaluation of high art and popular art by
naive and experienced viewers. Vis. Arts Res. 18, 1–14.

Winston, J.S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J.M., Perrett, D.I., Dolan, R.J., 2007. Brain systems
for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 45, 195–206.

Wright, P., Albarracin, D., Brown, R.D., Li, H., He, G., Liu, Y., 2008. Dissociated
responses in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to bottom-up and topdown
components of emotional evaluation. Neuroimage 39, 894–902.

Young, C.K., Eggermont, J.J., 2009. Coupling of mesoscopic brain oscillations: recent
advances in analytical and theoretical perspectives. Prog. Neurobiol. 89, 61–78.

Zaidel, D.W., 2005. Neuropsychology of Art. Neurological, Cognitive, and Evolutionary
Perspectiva. Psychology Press, New York.

Zaidel, D.W., 2010. Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and
evolution. J. Anat. 216, 177–183.

Zangemeister, W.H., Sherman, K., Stark, L., 1995. Evidence for a global scanpath
strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia
33, 1009–1025.

Zeki, S., 1999a. Art and the brain. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 76–96.

Zeki, S., 1999b. Inner Vision. An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.

Zysset, S., Huber, O., Ferstl, E., von Cramon, D.Y., 2002. The anterior frontomedian
cortex and evaluative judgment: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 15, 983–991.

== Links ==

=== Full Text ===
https://neuroaestheticsnet.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/cc2011.pdf

[[internal file]]

=== Sonstige Links ===

The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation - Versionsgeschichte

Gubachelier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Referenz == Cela-Conde, C.J., Agnati, L., Huston, J.P., Mora, F., Nadal, M.: The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in neurobiology …“