Computational Artistic Creativity and its Evaluation
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Brown, David: Computational Artistic Creativity and its Evaluation. In: Dagstuhl Seminar 09291 2009: Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
DOI
Abstract
For artistic creativity, in comparison to design creativity, requirements may not exist, and constraints on the artifact (the artistic “product”) are usually looser or absent. Many computational creativity systems produce artistic artifacts, but such results can be judged in a variety of ways: by a variety of artistic standards or by the perceiver’s "taste", for example. There is less chance of a generated artifact being judged in a single, clear and concrete fashion, so the standards may be softer and perhaps easier to satisfy: certainly harder to make computational. With regard to taste, Boden (1994) quotes, "I don’t know anything about art, but I know what I like”. If this were true in general, then there would be as many tests of the creativity of an artifact as there are people!
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@InProceedings{brown:DSP:2009:2220,
author = {David Brown},
title = {Computational Artistic Creativity and its Evaluation},
booktitle = {Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach},
year = {2009},
editor = {Margaret Boden and Mark D'Inverno and Jon McCormack},
number = {09291},
series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings},
ISSN = {1862-4405},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2220, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Computational_Artistic_Creativity_and_its_Evaluation },
annote = {Keywords: Evaluation, design creativity, artistic creativity, novelty, resolution, style, function}
}
Used References
Abrams MH (1953) Orientation of Critical Theories. From: The Mirror and the Lamp. In: Twentieth Century Literary Theory: an Introductory Anthology. V. Lambropoulos and D. N. Miller (Eds.), 1986, Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 3-31.
Amabile TM (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 997-1013.
Besemer SP and Treffinger DJ (1981) Analysis of Creative Products: Review and Synthesis, Journal of Creative Behavior, 15: 158-178.
Besemer SP (2006) Creating Products in the Age of Design. New Forums Press, Inc. Boden MA (1994) What is Creativity?, in MA Boden (ed.), Dimensions of Creativity. The MIT Press, pp. 75-117.
Brown DC (March 2008) Guiding Computational Design Creativity Research, Proc. NSF International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity'08, University of Provence, France. http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~dcb/Papers/sdc08-paper-Brown-25-Feb.pdf
Colton S (2008) Creativity versus the Perception of Creativity in Computational Systems. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Creative Systems.
Eysenck HJ (1994) The Measurement of Creativity, in MA Boden (ed.), Dimensions of Creativity. MIT Press, pp. 199-242.
Horn D and Salvendy G (2006) Consumer-Based Assessment of Product Creativity: A Review and Reappraisal, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16(2): 155.
Jirousek C (1995) Art, Design and Visual Thinking. http://char.txa.cornell.edu/, accessed 1st June 2009.
Minsky M (2006) The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. Simon & Schuster.
O’Quin K and Besemer SP (1989) Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Revised Creative Product Semantic Scale, Creativity Research Journal, 2: 267-278.
Russell SJ and Norvig P (2003) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall.
Spector L (ed.) (2008) Genetic Programming for Human-Competitive Designs, Special Issue, AI EDAM, 22(3).
Thornton S (2008) Seven Days in the Art World. W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.
Wikipedia (2009) Art, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art, accessed 1st June 2009.
Links
Full Text
http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2220/pdf/09291.BrownDavid.Paper.2220.pdf
Sonstige Links
http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/frontdoor.php?source_opus=2220
