Computational Creativity Infrastructure for Online Software Composition: A Conceptual Blending Use Case

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Reference

Martin Znidarsic, Amilcar Cardoso, Pablo Gervas, Pedro Martins, Raquel Hervas, Ana Alves, Hugo Oliveira, Ping Xiao, Simo Linkola, Hannu Toivonen, Janez Kranjc and Nada Lavrac: Computational Creativity Infrastructure for Online Software Composition: A Conceptual Blending Use Case. In: Computational Creativity 2016 ICCC 2016, 371-378

DOI

Abstract

Computational Creativity is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence research, studying how to engineer software that exhibits behaviors which would reasonably be deemed creative. This paper shows how composition of software solutions in this field can effectively be supported through a Computational Creativity (CC) infrastructure that supports user-friendly development of CC software components and workflows, their sharing, execution and reuse. The infrastructure allows CC researchers to build workflows that can be executed online and be reused by others with a single click on the workflow web address. Moreover, it allows building of procedures composed of software developed by different researchers from different laboratories, leading to novel ways of software composition for computational purposes that were not expected in advance. This capability is illustrated on a workflow that involves blending of texts from different domains, blending of corresponding images, poetry generation from texts as well as construction of narratives. The paper concludes by presenting plans for future work.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Martin Znidarsic, Amilcar Cardoso, Pablo Gervas, Pedro Martins, Raquel Hervas, Ana Alves, Hugo Oliveira, Ping Xiao, Simo Linkola, Hannu Toivonen, Janez Kranjc and Nada Lavrac},
 title = {Computational Creativity Infrastructure for Online Software Composition: A Conceptual Blending Use Case},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2016},
 year = {2016},
 month = {Jun-July},
 location = {Paris, France},
 pages = {371-378},
 url = {http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Computational-Creativity-Infrastructure-for-Online-Software-Composition.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Computational_Creativity_Infrastructure_for_Online_Software_Composition:_A_Conceptual_Blending_Use_Case },
 publisher = {Sony CSL Paris},
}


Used References

Bird, S. 2006. NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, 69–72. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Charnley, J.; Colton, S.; and Llano, M. T. 2014. The FloWr Framework: Automated Flowchart Construction, Optimisation and Alteration for Creative Systems. In Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC- 2014), 315–323.

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gonc¸alo Oliveira, H., and Cardoso, A. 2015. Poetry generation with PoeTryMe. In Besold, T. R.; Schorlemmer, M.; and Smaill, A., eds., Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines, Atlantis Thinking Machines. Atlantis-Springer. chapter 12, 243–266.

Kranjc, J.; Podpeˇcan, V.; and Lavraˇc, N. 2012. Clowdflows: A cloud based scientific workflow platform. In Flach, P. A.; Bie, T. D.; and Cristianini, N., eds., ECML/PKDD (2), volume 7524 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 816–819. Springer.

Mausam; Schmitz, M.; Bart, R.; Soderland, S.; and Etzioni, O. 2012. Open language learning for information extraction. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CONLL).

Miller, G. A. 1995. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11):39–41.

Novak, J. 1998. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Oliveira, A.; Pereira, F. C.; and Cardoso, A. 2001. Automatic reading and learning from text. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 69–72.

Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V.; et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:2825–2830.

Pereira, F. C. 2005. Creativity and AI: A Conceptual Blending approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. Engenharia Inform ´atica da FCTUC, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.

Reiter, E., and Dale, R. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press.

Schorlemmer, M.; Smaill, A.; K¨uhnberger, K.-U.; Kutz, O.; Colton, S.; Cambouropoulos, E.; and Pease, A. 2014. COINVENT: Towards a computational concept invention theory. In Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC-14, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 288–296.

Thagard, P., and Stewart, T. C. 2010. The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science 35(1):1–33.

Veale, T., and O’Donoghue, D. 2000. Computation and blending. Cognitive Linguistics Special Issue on Conceptual Blending:253–282.

Xiao, P., and Linkola, S. 2015. Vismantic: Meaning-making with images. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC2015, 158–165.


Links

Full Text

http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Computational-Creativity-Infrastructure-for-Online-Software-Composition.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links