Evolving Human Faces

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Referenz

Frowd, Charlie; Hancock, Peter: Evolving Human Faces. In: Romero, Juan; Machado, Penousal: The Art of Artificial Evolution. Springer, Berlin, 2007, S. 189-210.

DOI

http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-72877-1_9

Abstract

Witnesses and victims of serious crime are normally requested to construct a picture of the criminal’s face. These pictures are known as facial composites and are typically produced by a witness recalling details of the face and then selecting individual facial features: hair, eyes, nose, mouth, etc. While composites remain an important tool for the apprehension of criminals, research has suggested that, even under favorable conditions, they are rarely recognized. In the current chapter, we present a new method called EvoFIT whereby users select complete faces and a composite is “evolved” using a Genetic Algorithm. While considerable development was required to tune the new approach, research indicates that EvoFIT now produces more identifiable composites than those produced from the traditional “feature” systems. Novel applications of the technology are also discussed.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

Used References

Davies, G.M., van der Willik, P., Morrison, L.J. (2000). Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1): 19–124

Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P.J.B., Newman, C., Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one. combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 894–902

Brace, N., Pike, G., Kemp, R. (2000). Investigating e-fit using famous faces. In: Forensic Psychology and Law Krakow. Institute of Forensic Research Publishers, 272–276

Frowd, C.D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., McLanaghan, S., Hancock, P.J.B. (2005). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime and Law, 11: 33–52

Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J., Davies, G.M. (1975). Use of photo-fit for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66: 29–37

Davies, G.M. (1983). Forensic face recall: the role of visual and verbal information. In Lloyd-Bostock, S.M.A., Clifford, B.R., eds.: Evaluating witness evidence. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 103–123

Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J. (1978). Face identification: The influence of delay upon accuracy of photofit construction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6(1): 35–42

Tanaka, J.W., Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(A): 225–245

Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Ness, H., Bowie, L., Paterson, J., Thomson-Bogner, C., McIntyre, A., Hancock, P.J.B. (2007). Parallel approaches to composite production. Ergonomics, 50(4): 562–585

Frowd, D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Mcquiston-Surrett, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., Hancock, P. (2005). Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10(1): 63–81

Frowd, C.D., McQuiston-Surrett, D., Anandaciva, S., Ireland, C., Hancock, P.J.B. (2007). An evaluation of US systems for facial composite production. Ergonomics

Koehn, C.E., Fisher, R.P. (1997). Constructing facial composites with the mac-a-mug pro system. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3: 215–224

Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., Davies, G.M. (1980). The deterioration of verbal descriptions of faces over different delay intervals. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8: 101–106

Shepherd, J.W. (1983). Identification after long delays. In: Evaluating Witness Evidence. Wiley, 173–187

Eysenck, M.W., Keane, M.T. (2005). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook. 5th edn. Psychology Press, UK

Frowd, C.D. (2002). EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging system. http://www.psychology.stir.ac.uk/staff/cfrowd/Thesis.txt 404

Frowd, C.D., Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). Facial composites: image modality and multiple attempts. In: IEEE Crime and Security. London

Frowd, C.D., Hancock, P.J.B., Carson, D. (2004). EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Transactions on Applied Psychology (TAP), 1: 1–21

Gibson, S.J., Solomon, C.J., Pallares-Bejarano, A. (2003). Synthesis of photographic quality facial composites using evolutionary algorithms. In Harvey, R., Bangham, J.A., eds.: British Machine Vision Conference, 221–230

Tredoux, C., Rosenthal, Y. (1999). Face reconstruction using a configural, eigenface-based composite system. In: SARMAC III. Boulder, Colorado

Schmidt, H. (2006). Personal communication

Dawkins, R. (1996). The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. W. W. Norton

Crichton, M. (2002). Prey. Harper-Collins. London

Caldwell, C., Johnston, V.S. (1991). Tracking a criminal suspect through “face-space” with a genetic algorithm. In: Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 416–421

Sirovich, L., Kirby, M. (1987). Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4: 519–524

Hancock, P.J.B., Bruce, V., Burton, A.M. (1997). Testing principal component representations for faces. In Bullinaria, J.A., Glasspool, D.W., Houghton, G., eds.: 4th Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. Springer. London, 84–97

Cootes, T.F., Walker, K.N., Taylor, C.J. (2000). View-based active appearance models. In: FG ’00: Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 227–232

Brunelli, R., Mich, O. (1996). SpotIt! an interactive identikit system. Graphical models and image processing: GMIP, 58(5): 399–404

Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A., Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). Lost in space. Unpublished

Pike, G., Brace, N., Turner, J., Kynan, S. (2005). Making faces with computers: Witness cognition and technology. Pragmatics and Cognition, 13: 459–479

Hancock, P.J.B. (2000). Evolving faces from principal components. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32: 327–333

Mitchell, M. (1996). An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, USA

Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Storås, K., Spick, P., Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). An evaluation of morphed composites constructed in a criminal investigation. In: 16th Conference of the European Association of Psychology and Law

Olsson, N., Juslin, P. (1999). Can self-reported encoding strategy and recognition skill be diagnostic of performance in eyewitness identification? Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 42–49

Shapiro, P.N., Penrod, S.D. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification rates. Psychological Bulletin, 100: 139–156

Shepherd, J.W., Ellis, H.D., McMurran, M., Davies, G.M. (1978). Effect of character attribution on photofit construction of a face. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8: 263–268

Ellis, H.D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66: 404–426

Johnston, V.S., Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14: 183–199

Johnston, V.S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4): 251–267

Howdle, J. (2005). A cross cultural comparison of the attractiveness preferences of African and British males

Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). Predict your child: a system to suggest the facial appearance of children. Unpublished

Bressan, P., Grassi, M. (2006). Parental resemblance in one-year-olds and the gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25: 133–141

Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). A comparison of police and future EvoFIT face models. unpublished


Links

Full Text

http://www.evofit.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Frowd-and-Hancock-2007.-Evolving-human-faces.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links