Mathematics Learning through Arts and Collaborative Problem-Solving: The Princess and the Diamond-Problem
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Markus Hähkiöniemi, Kristóf Fenyvesi, Johanna Pöysä-Tarhonen, Mirja Tarnanen, Päivi Häkkinen, Merja Kauppinen, Anne Martin and Pasi Nieminen: Mathematics Learning through Arts and Collaborative Problem-Solving: The Princess and the Diamond-Problem. In: Bridges 2016, Pages 97–104.
DOI
Abstract
In this paper, we examine a mathematics education course which focused on collaborative mathematical problem solving in art topics. The students of the course were Finnish primary school pre-service teachers. During the course students investigated tessellations, reflected on their experiences and designed workshops for pupils. The course meetings were video recorded. Students’ work contained elements of mathematical problem solving and gave them experiences of working collaboratively. The topic of tessellation was found suitable for this purpose.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{bridges2016:97,
author = {Markus H\"{a}hki\"{o}niemi, Krist\'{o}f Fenyvesi, Johanna P\"{o}ys\"{a}-Tarhonen, Mirja Tarnanen, P\"{a}ivi H\"{a}kkinen, Merja Kauppinen, Anne Martin and Pasi Nieminen},
title = {Mathematics Learning through Arts and Collaborative Problem-Solving: \\ The Princess and the Diamond-Problem},
pages = {97--104},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Bridges 2016: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Education, Culture},
year = {2016},
editor = {Eve Torrence, Bruce Torrence, Carlo S\'equin, Douglas McKenna, Krist\'of Fenyvesi and Reza Sarhangi},
isbn = {978-1-938664-19-9},
issn = {1099-6702},
publisher = {Tessellations Publishing},
address = {Phoenix, Arizona},
url = {http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Mathematics_Learning_through_Arts_and_Collaborative_Problem-Solving:_The_Princess_and_the_Diamond-Problem},
note = {Available online at \url{http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2016/bridges2016-97.html}}
}
Used References
[1] A. Schoenfeld, Mathematical Problem Solving, London: Academic Press. 1985.
[2] J. Jacobs, J. Hiebert, K. Givvin, H. Hollingsworth, H. Garnier, & D. Wearne, Does Eight-grade Mathematics Teaching in the United States Align with the NCTM Standards? Results from TIMSS 1995 and 1999 Video Studies, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, pp. 5-32. 2006.
[3] M. Stein, B. Grover, & M. Henningsen, Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, pp. 455-488. 1996.
[4] P. Ernest, Philosophy, Mathematics and Education, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 20(4), pp. 555-559. 1989.
[5] H. Hesse, E. Care, J. Buder, J. Sassenberg, & P. Griffin, Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills, in P. Griffin & E. Care (eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Methods and Approach, Dortdrecht: Springer, pp. 37-56. 2015.
[6] R. Borasi, J. Fonzi, C. Smith, & B. Rose, Beginning the Process of Rethinking Mathematics Instruction: A Professional Development Program, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), pp. 49–78. 1999.
[7] J. Frykholm, Teacher’s Tolerance for Discomfort: Implications for Curricular Reform in Mathematics, Journal for Curriculum and Supervision, 19(2), pp. 125-149. 2004.
[8] J. Waters (Fox), A Study of Mathematical Patterning in Early Childhood Settings, in I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. MacLean (eds.), Mathematics education for the 3rd millennium: Towards 2010. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia . Townsville, Queensland, Australia, pp. 321-328. 2004.
[9] L. Cooper, S. Spitzer, & M. Tomayko, Become an Escher Sleuth, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), pp. 378-385. 2013.
[10] R. Reys, R. Reys, & B. Reys, Sport Courts and Fields: A Context for Estimation and Tessellation, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(9), pp. 566-570. 2013.
[11] M. Civil, Chapter 4: Everyday Mathematics, Mathematicians' Mathematics, and School Mathematics: Can We Bring Them Together?, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph, Vol. 11, Everyday and Academic Mathematics in the Classroom, pp. 40-62. 2002.
[12] S. Eberle, The Role of Children’s Mathematical Aesthetics: The Case of Tessellations, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, pp. 129–43. 2014.
[13] L. Rumanová, & E. Smiešková, Creativity And Motivation For Geometric Tasks Designing In Education, Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1), pp. 49-56. 2015.
[14] K. Fenyvesi, R. Koskimaa, & Zs. Lavicza, Experiential Education of Mathematics: Art and Games for Digital Natives. Kasvatus & Aika, 2015/1, pp. 107-134. 2015.
[15] X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, & J. M. Spector (eds.), Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education, Springer International Publishing. 2015
[16] K. Fenyvesi, I. Oláh, & I. Szilágyi (eds.), Adventures on Paper. Exercise Book for Experience-centered Education of Mathematics, Eger: Eger University. 2014.
[17] P. Gailiunas, Spiral Tilings, in R. Sarhangi (ed.), BRIDGES Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science, pp. 133-140. 2000.
[18] P. Gailiunas, Some Monohedral Tilings Derived From Regular Polygons, in R. Sarhangi & J. Barrallo (eds.), BRIDGES Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and· Science, pp. 9-14. 2007.
[19] P. Gailiunas, Two Spirals for the Price of One and Asymmetric Tiling, Bridges 2007 Art Exhibit. URL: http://www.bridgesmathart.org/art-exhibits/bridges2007/gailiunas.html
[20] J. Mason, L. Burton, & K. Stacey, Thinking mathematically, Bristol: Addison–Wesley. 1982.
[21] G. Pólya, How to Solve It? A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, Princeton University Press. 1945.
[22] E. Pehkonen, Introduction to the Concept ’Open-Ended Problem’, in E. Pehkonen (ed.), Use of Open-Ended Problems on Mathematics Classroom, University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education, Research Report 176, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 7-11. 1997.
[23] N. Nohda, Teaching by Open-Approach Method in Japanese Mathematics Classroom, in T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of theIinternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima, Japan: PME, Vol. 1, pp. 39–53. 2000.
[24] O. N. Kwon, J. S. Park, & J. H. Park, Cultivating Divergent Thinking in Mathematics through an Open-Ended Approach, Asia Pacific Educational Review, 7(1), pp. 51–61. 2006.
[25] P. Dillenbourg, & F. Hong, The Mechanics of CSCL Macro Scripts, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), pp. 5-23. 2008.
[26] P. Näykki, J. Pöysä-Tarhonen, S. Järvelä, & P. Häkkinen, Enhancing Teacher Education Students’ Collaborative Problem Solving and Shared Regulation of Learning, in O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen (eds.), Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 514-517. 2015.
[27] B. Zimmerman, A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), pp. 329-339. 1989.
[28] M. Bannert, & P. Reimann, Supporting Self-Regulated Hypermedia Learning through Prompts, Instructional Science, 40(1), pp. 193-211. 2012.
Links
Full Text
http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2016/bridges2016-97.pdf
