Measuring cultural value using social network analysis: a case study on valuing electronic musicians

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

Anna Jordanous, Daniel Allington and Byron Dueck: Measuring cultural value using social network analysis: a case study on valuing electronic musicians. In: Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015, 110-117.

DOI

Abstract

In evaluating how creative a program or an artefact is, a key factor to consider is the value inherent in that program or artefact. We investigate how to measure subjective, cultural value: value which has been expressed by members of a community towards other members. Specifically we focus on a case study asking: to what extent can we use social network activity to examine the value that electronic musicians place in each other’s work? Focusing on activity by electronic musicians on the music social network SoundCloud, we combined qualitative and quantitative research to understand and trace significant ‘valuing activities’ in Sound- Cloud data. Exploring interaction on the site in this guided way has enabled us to compare, contrast and assess what value is attributed to different members of the electronic music community on SoundCloud. In this paper we report our results and consider how this work offers a methodology for computational analysis of cultural value. We hypothesise that this methodology is extensible to other creative domains; potentially this could lead to a tool for automated cultural value judgement methods on large social network datasets. Hence we move towards computationally generated evaluations of value, a fundamental part of creativity.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Jordanous, Anna and Allington, Daniel and Dueck, Byron},
 title = {Measuring cultural value using social network analysis: a case study on valuing electronic musicians},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2015},
 year = {2015},
 month = {Jun},
 location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
 pages = {110-117},
 url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/5_3Jordanous.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Measuring_cultural_value_using_social_network_analysis:_a_case_study_on_valuing_electronic_musicians },
 publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
 keywords = {computational, creativity},
}

Used References

Allington, D. Producing the Cultural Value of Interactive Fiction: Field Theory, Social Network Analysis, and the Text Adventure Game.

Allington, D.; Dueck, B.; and Jordanous, A. 2015. Networks of Value in Electronic Dance Music: SoundCloud, London, and the Importance of Place.

Allington, D.; Jordanous, A.; and Dueck, B. 2014. Online Networks and the Production of Value in Electronic Music.

Blacking, J. 1973. How musical is man? Univ. Washington Press.

Boden, M. A. 2004. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge, 2nd edition.

Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Colton, S. 2008. Creativity versus the Perception of Creativity in Computational Systems. In Proceedings of AAAI Symposium on Creative Systems, 14–20.

Cook, M., and Colton, S. 2014. Ludus Ex Machina: Building A 3D Game Designer That Competes Alongside Humans. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1988. Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J., ed., The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 13, 325–339.

De Nooy, W. 2003. Fields and Networks: Correspondence Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Framework of Field Theory. Poetics 31(5-6):305–327.

DHA Communications. 2012. The Working Musician. Report for the Musicians’ Union.

Dueck, B. 2013. Jazz Endings, Aesthetic Discourse, and Musical Publics. Black Music Research Journal 33(1):91–115.

Elafros, A. 2013. Greek Hip Hop: Local and Translocal Authentication in the Restricted Field of Production. Poetics 41(1):75–95.

Finnegan, R. 2007. The Hidden Musicians: Music-Making in an English Town. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press, 2nd ed.

Jordanous, A.; Allington, D.; and Dueck, B. 2014. Using online networks to analyse the value of electronic music. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.

Jordanous, A., and Keller, B. 2012. What makes musical improvisation creative? Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 6(2):151–175.

Jordanous, A. 2011. Evaluating Evaluation: Assessing Progress in Computational Creativity Research. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC-11).

Jordanous, A. 2012a. A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative. Cognitive Computation 4(3):246–279.

Jordanous, A. 2012b. Evaluating Computational Creativity: A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems and its Application. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sussex.

Lee, M., and Silver, D. 2014. Testing the Springsteen Conjecture: “Exploring the Post-Authentic Musical World” with big, messy internet data. http://badhessian.org/2014/07/testingthe-springsteen-conjecture-exploring-the-post-authentic-musicalworld-with-big-messy-internet-data/ last accessed Feb 2015.

Lena, J. C., and Pachucki, M. C. 2013. The Sincerest Form of Flattery: Innovation, Repetition, and Status in an Art Movement. Poetics 41(3):236–264.

Lopes, P. 2000. Pierre Bourdieu’s Fields of Cultural Production: a Case Study of Modern Jazz. In Brown, N., and Szeman, I., eds., Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. 165–185.

McCormack, J. 2007. Creative Ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, 129–136.

Moffat, D. C., and Kelly, M. 2006. An investigation into people’s bias against computational creativity in music composition. In Proceedings of the 3rd International JointWorkshop on Computational Creativity ECAI06 Workshop.

Pease, A.; Guhe, M.; and Smaill, A. 2010. Some Aspects of Analogical Reasoning in Mathematical Creativity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, 60–64.

P´erez y P´erez, R.; Aguilar, A.; and Negrete, S. 2010. The ERIDesigner: A Computer Model for the Arrangement of Furniture. Minds and Machines 20(4):533–564.

Pihlaja, S. 2012. The development of ‘drama’ in YouTube discource. Ph.D. Dissertation, Open University.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program. Minds and Machines 17:67–99.

Turino, T. 2008. Music as Social Life: The Politics of Participation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Links

Full Text

http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/5_3Jordanous.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links