Mere Generation: Essential Barometer or Dated Concept?

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Version vom 30. Dezember 2016, 21:28 Uhr von Gubachelier (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Dan Ventura: Mere Generation: Essential Barometer or Dated Concept?. In: Computational Creativity 2016 ICCC 2016, 17-24 == DOI == ==…“)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

Dan Ventura: Mere Generation: Essential Barometer or Dated Concept?. In: Computational Creativity 2016 ICCC 2016, 17-24

DOI

Abstract

The computational creativity community (rightfully) takes a dim view of supposedly creative systems that operate by mere generation. However, what exactly this means has never been adequately defined, and therefore the idea of requiring systems to exceed this standard is problematic. Here, we revisit the question of mere generation and attempt to qualitatively identify what constitutes exceeding this threshold. This exercise leads to the conclusion that the question is likely no longer relevant for the field and that a failure to recognize this is likely detrimental to its future health.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Dan Ventura},
 title = {Mere Generation: Essential Barometer or Dated Concept?},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2016},
 year = {2016},
 month = {Jun-July},
 location = {Paris, France},
 pages = {17-24},
 url = {http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Mere-Generation.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Mere_Generation:_Essential_Barometer_or_Dated_Concept%3F },
 publisher = {Sony CSL Paris},
}


Used References

Colton, S.; Charnley, J.; and Pease, A. 2011. Computational creativity theory: The FACE and IDEA descriptive models. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity, 90–95.

Jordanous, A. 2012. A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative. Cognitive Computation 4(3):246–279.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17:67– 99.

Ventura, D. 2008. A reductio ad absurdum experiment in sufficiency for evaluating (computational) creative systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, 11–19.


Links

Full Text

http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Mere-Generation.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links