Stimulating creative flow through computational feedback

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Version vom 15. November 2015, 00:09 Uhr von Gubachelier (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

Jones, Daniel ; Oliver Bown ; Jon McCormack ; Pachet, Francois ; Young, Michael ; Berry, Rodney ; Asaf, Iris ; Porter, Benjamin: Stimulating creative flow through computational feedback. In: Dagstuhl Seminar 09291 2009: Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach.

DOI

Abstract

This report summarises the discussion and experimental work produced by the authors at the 2009 symposium Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Dagstuhl Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. It outlines the motivation for using computational techniques to stimulate human creativity, briefly summarising its historical context and predecessors, and describes two software studies produced by the group as base-line exemplars of these ideas.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@InProceedings{jones_et_al:DSP:2009:2223,
 author =	{Daniel Jones and Oliver Bown and Jon McCormack and Francois Pachet and Michael Young and Rodney Berry and Iris Asaf and Benjamin Porter},
 title =	{Stimulating creative flow through computational feedback},
 booktitle =	{Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach},
 year = 	{2009},
 editor =	{Margaret Boden and Mark D'Inverno and Jon McCormack},
 number =	{09291},
 series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings},
 ISSN = 	{1862-4405},
 publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany},
 address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
 URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2223, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Stimulating_creative_flow_through_computational_feedback },
 annote =	{Keywords: Computational creativity}
}

Used References

[1] Paul Andr ́e, M. C. Schraefel, Jaime Teevan, and Susan T. Dumais. Dis- covery Is Never by Chance: Designing for (Un)Serendipity. In C&C ’09, Berkeley, California, 2009. ACM.

[2] Tim Blackwell and Michael Young. Swarm Granulator. In G R Raidl et al, editor, EvoWorkshops 2004, pages 399–408, Berlin, 2004. LNCS 3005, Springer-Verlag.

[3] Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi. Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. Random House, London, 1992.

[4] Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. Oblique Strategies: Over 100 worthwhile dilemmas by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. Apollo, London, 1975.

[5] Philip Galanter. What is generative art? complexity theory as a context for art theory. In GA2003 6th Generative Art Conference, 2003.

[6] Paul Klee. Pedagogical Sketchbook. Faber and Faber, London, 1972.

[7] Harry Matthews and Alastair Brotchie. The Oulipo Compendium. Atlas Press, London, 2005.

[8] Francois Pachet. The continuator: Musical interaction with style. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3):333–341, 2003.

[9] Eddie Pr ́evost. Minute Particulars: meanings in music - making in the wake of hierarchial realignments and other essays. Copula, London, 2004.

[10] R. Keith Sawyer. Group creativity: musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2):148–165, 2006.

[11] Hazel Smith and Roger Dean. Improvisation, Hypermedia and the Arts since 1945. Harwood, Amsterdam, 1997.


Links

Full Text

http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2223/pdf/09291.JonesDaniel.Paper.2223.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links

http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/frontdoor.php?source_opus=2223