The man behind the curtain: Overcoming skepticism about creative computers

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

Martin Mumford and Dan Ventura: The man behind the curtain: Overcoming skepticism about creative computers. In: Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015, 1-7.

DOI

Abstract

The common misconception among non-specialists is that a computer program can only perform tasks which the programmer knows how to perform (albeit much faster). This leads to a belief that if an artificial system exhibits creative behavior, it only does so because it is leveraging the programmer’s creativity. We review past efforts to evaluate creative systems and identify the biases against them. As evidenced in our case studies, a common bias indicates that creativity requires both intelligence and autonomy. We suggest that in order to overcome this skepticism, separation of programmer and program is crucial and that the program must be the responsible party for convincing the observer of this separation.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Mumford, Martin and Ventura, Dan},
 title = {The man behind the curtain: Overcoming skepticism about creative computers},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2015},
 year = {2015},
 month = {Jun},
 location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
 pages = {1-7},
 url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/1_1Mumford.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=The_man_behind_the_curtain:_Overcoming_skepticism_about_creative_computers },
 publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
 keywords = {computational, creativity},
}

Used References

Bringsjord, S.; Bello, P.; and Ferrucci, D. 2003. Creativity, the Turing test, and the (better) Lovelace test. In The Turing Test. Springer. 215–239.

Colton, S.; Pease, A.; and Charnley, J. 2011. Computational creativity theory: The face and idea descriptive models. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity, 90–95.

Colton, S. 2008a. Automatic invention of fitness functions with application to scene generation. In Applications of Evolutionary Computing. Springer. 381–391.

Colton, S. 2008b. Creativity versus the perception of creativity in computational systems. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Creative Intelligent Systems, 14–20.

Cook, M. 2013. Creativity in code: generating rules for video games. ACM Crossroads 19(4):40–43.

Dartnall, T. 1994. Artificial Intelligence and Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach, volume 17. Springer Science & Business Media.

Duggan, M., and Smith, A. 2013. 6% of online adults are Reddit users. Pew Internet & American Life Project 3. Jennings, K. E. 2010. Developing creativity: Artificial barriers in artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines 20(4):489– 501. Jordanous, A. 2014. Stepping back to progress forwards: Setting standards for meta-evaluation of computational creativity. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.

Kim, K. H. 2006. Can we trust creativity tests? a review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal 18(1):3–14.

Maher, M. L.; Brady, K.; and Fisher, D. H. 2013. Computational models of surprise in evaluating creative design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Creativity, 147–151.

Pease, A., and Colton, S. 2011. On impact and evaluation in computational creativity: A discussion of the Turing test and an alternative proposal. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on AI and Philosophy.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17:76– 99. Saunders, R., and Gero, J. S. 2001. Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. In Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney. 113–139.

Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3):417–424.

Wiggins, G. A. 2006. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(7):449–458.


Links

Full Text

http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/1_1Mumford.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links