Quelltext der Seite Preconceptual Creativity

== Reference ==
Tapio Takala: [[Preconceptual Creativity]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015]], 252-259. 

== DOI ==

== Abstract ==
Creativity, whether seen in personal or historical scope,
is always relative, subject to the contextual expectations
of an observer. From the point of view of a creative
agent, such expectations can be seen as soft constraints
that must be violated in order to be deemed as creative.
In the present work, learned conventions are modeled
as emergent activity clusters (pre-concepts) in a selforganizing
memory. That is used as a framework to
model such phenomena as stereotypical categorization
and mental inertia which restrain the mind when searching
for new solutions. Using the kinematics of a robotic
hand as an example, the models' dynamic behavior
demonstrates primitive creativity without symbolic reasoning.
The model suggests cognitive mechanisms that
potentially explain how expectations are formed and
under which conditions an agent is able to break out of
them and surprise itself.

== Extended Abstract ==

== Bibtex == 
 @inproceedings{
  author = {Takala, Tapio},
  title = {Preconceptual Creativity},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
  series = {ICCC2015},
  year = {2015},
  month = {Jun},
  location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
  pages = {252-259},
  url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/11_2Takala.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Preconceptual_Creativity },
  publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
  keywords = {computational, creativity},
 }

== Used References ==
Boden, M. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms,
Weidenfeld & Nicholson (2nd ed. Routledge, 2004).

Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation.
Artificial intelligence, 47(1), 139-159.

Brooks, R., & Stein, L. (1994). Building brains for bodies.
Autonomous Robots, 1(1), 7-25.

Chella, A., Gaglio, S., Oliveri, G., Augello, A., & Pilato,
G. (2014). Creativity in Conceptual Spaces. In 5th Intl.
Conf. on Computational Creativity, 306-314.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: flow and the psychology
of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.

Duka, A. V. (2014). Neural network based inverse kinematics
solution for trajectory tracking of a robotic arm.
Procedia Technology, 12, 20-27.

Egner, T., Monti, J. & Summerfield, C. (2010). Expectation
and Surprise Determine Neural Population Responses
in the Ventral Visual Stream. The Journal of Neuroscience,
30(49), 16601–16608.

Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the 'neurds': Characterizing
creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of
human memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1-13.

Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of
thought. MIT press.

Goldstone, R. L., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2010). Categorical
perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive
Science, 1(1), 69-78.

Grace, K., & Maher, M. L. (2014). What to expect when
you’re expecting: the role of unexpectedness in computationally
evaluating creativity. In 4th Intl. Conf. on Computational
Creativity, 120-128.

Hofstadter, D., & Mitchell, M. (1994). The copycat project:
A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making. Advances
in connectionist and neural computation theory,
2(31-112), 29-30.

Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Araujo, D., & Passos, P. (2011).
Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in
complex neurobiological systems: a basis for creativity in
sport. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences,
15(2), 175-206.

Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation.
Design studies, 12(1), 3-11.

Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor
performance. Psychological bulletin, 70(6p1), 387-403.
Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps (Vol. 30).
Springer Science & Business Media.

Kohonen, T., Kaski, S., Lagus, K., Salojarvi, J., Honkela,
J., Paatero, V., & Saarela, A. (2000). Self organization of a
massive document collection. Neural Networks, IEEE
Transactions on, 11(3), 574-585.

Lorini, E., & Falcone, R. (2005). Modeling expectations in
cognitive agents. In AAAI 2005 Fall Symposium: From
Reactive to Anticipatory Cognitive Embodied Systems.
114-121.

Maher, M. L., Brady, K., & Fisher, D. (2013). Computational
models of surprise in evaluating creative design. In
4th Intl. Conf. on Computational Creativity, 147-151.

Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are
we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity
Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120.

Newell, A., Shaw, C., & Simon, H. A. (1959). The processes
of creative thinking. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Pylyshyn, Z. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects,
and situated vision. Cognition 80(1), 127-158.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive psychology,
4(3), 328-350.

Rosch, E., Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (1992). The embodied
mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT
press.

Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.).
(2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive
science. MIT Press.

Takala, T. (2005). Creativity as disruptive adaptation – a
computational case study. In: Gero and Maher (eds.),
Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design
VI, Univ. of Sydney, 95-110.

Wiley, D. J., & Hahn, J. K. (1997). Interpolation synthesis
of articulated figure motion. Computer Graphics and Applications,
IEEE, 17(6), 39-45.


== Links ==
=== Full Text === 
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/11_2Takala.pdf

[[intern file]]

=== Sonstige Links ===