Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == Magnus Jändel: Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making. In: Computational Creativity 2013 ICCC 2013. == DOI == …“) |
|||
| Zeile 2: | Zeile 2: | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
| − | Magnus Jändel: [[Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2013 ICCC 2013]]. | + | Magnus Jändel: [[Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making]]. In: [[Computational Creativity 2013 ICCC 2013]], 118-122. |
== DOI == | == DOI == | ||
| Zeile 27: | Zeile 27: | ||
== Bibtex == | == Bibtex == | ||
| + | @inproceedings{ | ||
| + | author = {Magnus Jändel}, | ||
| + | title = {Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making}, | ||
| + | editor = {Simon Colton, Dan Ventura, Nada Lavrac, Michael Cook}, | ||
| + | booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity}, | ||
| + | series = {ICCC2013}, | ||
| + | year = {2013}, | ||
| + | month = {Jun}, | ||
| + | location = {Sydney, New South Wales, Australia}, | ||
| + | pages = {118-122}, | ||
| + | url = {http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2013/download/iccc2013-jandel.pdf, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Computational_Creativity_in_Naturalistic_Decision–Making }, | ||
| + | publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity}, | ||
| + | keywords = {computational, creativity}, | ||
| + | } | ||
== Used References == | == Used References == | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 12. November 2015, 23:07 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Magnus Jändel: Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making. In: Computational Creativity 2013 ICCC 2013, 118-122.
DOI
Abstract
Creativity can be of great importance in decision-making and applying computational creativity to decision support is comparatively feasible since novelty and value often can be evaluated by a reasonable human effort or by simulation. A prominent model for how humans make real-life decisions is reviewed and we identify and discuss six opportunities for enhancing the process with computational creativity. It is found that computational creativity can be employed for suggesting courses of action, unnoticed situation features, plan improvements, unseen anomalies, situation reassess- ments and information to explore. For each such enhance- ment opportunity tentative computational creativity methods are examined. Relevant trends in decision support research are related to the resulting framework and we speculate on how computational creativity methods such as story genera- tion could be used for decision support.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{
author = {Magnus Jändel},
title = {Computational Creativity in Naturalistic Decision–Making},
editor = {Simon Colton, Dan Ventura, Nada Lavrac, Michael Cook},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2013},
year = {2013},
month = {Jun},
location = {Sydney, New South Wales, Australia},
pages = {118-122},
url = {http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2013/download/iccc2013-jandel.pdf, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Computational_Creativity_in_Naturalistic_Decision–Making },
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}
Used References
Boden, M. 2009. Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine 30(3):23–34.
Bushinsky, S. 2009. Deus ex machina a higher creative species in the game of chess. AI Magazine 30(3):63–69.
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Con- ceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
Ghallab, M.; Nau, D.S.; .and Traverso, P. 2004. Automated Plan- ning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann.
Hill, L. G. 2010. ShockWave Science and Technology Reference Library, V 5, Non-Shock Initiation of Explosives. Springer.
Johnson, J., and Raab, M. 2003. Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes 91:215229.
Jändel, M. 2013. Computational creativity for counterdeception in information fusion. Unpublished, submitted to 16th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion.
Kahneman, D.; Slovic, P.; and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgement un- der uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
Klein, G.; Calderwood, R.; and Clinton-Cirocco, A. 1986. Rapid decision-making on the fireground. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergometrics Society, 576–580.
Klein, G. 2003. Intuition at work. New York: Doubleday.
Klein, G. 2008. Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors 50:456–460.
Li, B.; Zook, A.; Davis, N.; and Riedl, M. . 2012. Goal driven conceptual blending: A computational approach for creativity. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computa- tional Creativity.
McCaffrey, T., and Spector, L. 2011. How the obscure features hypothesis leads to innovation assistant software. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Crea- tivity.
Meehan, J. 1976, The Metanovel: Writing stories by computer. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale.
Riedl, M. O., and Sugandh, N. 2008. Story planning with vi- gnettes: Toward overcoming the content production bottleneck. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint International Conference on Interac- tive Digital Storytelling: Interactive Storytelling, ICIDS ’08, 168– 179. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Ross, K.; Klein, G.; Thunholm, P.; Scmitt, J.; and Baxter, H. 2004. The recognition-primed decision model. Military Review July-August, 6–10.
Surdu, J. R., and Kittka, K. 2008. The deep green concept. In Proceedings of the 2008 Spring simulation multiconference, SpringSim ’08, 623–631. San Diego, CA, USA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
Tan, K.-M. T., and Kwok, K. 2009. Scenario generation using double-scope blending. In AAAI Fall Symposium.
Towler, M. 2010. Rational decision making: An introduction. Wiley.
Triantaphyllou, E. 2002. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Meth- ods: A Comparative Study. Kluwer.
Yates, J.; Veinott, E.; and Patalano, A. 2003. Hard decisions, bad decisions: On decision quality and decision aiding. In Schneider, S., and Shanteau., eds., Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge University Press. 13–63.
Links
Full Text
http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2013/download/iccc2013-jandel.pdf
