When novelty is not enough: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Referenz == Cuccu, G., Gomez, F.: When novelty is not enough. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6624, pp. 234–243…“) |
(kein Unterschied)
|
Version vom 12. Juni 2016, 11:07 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Referenz
Cuccu, G., Gomez, F.: When novelty is not enough. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6624, pp. 234–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20525-5_24
Abstract
The idea of evolving novel rather than fit solutions has recently been offered as a way to automatically discover the kind of complex solutions that exhibit truly intelligent behavior. So far, novelty search has only been studied in the context of problems where the number of possible “different” solutions has been limited. In this paper, we show, using a task with a much larger solution space, that selecting for novelty alone does not offer an advantage over fitness-based selection. In addition, we examine how the idea of novelty search can be used to sustain diversity and improve the performance of standard, fitness-based search.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@incollection{
year={2016},
isbn={978-3-319-31007-7},
booktitle={Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design},
volume={9596},
series={Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
editor={Johnson, Colin and Ciesielski, Vic and Correia, João and Machado, Penousal},
doi={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16498-4_3},
title={},
url={ },
publisher={Springer International Publishing},
keywords={Computational aesthetics; Deep learning; Evolved abstract images},
author={},
pages={},
language={English}
}
Used References
Links
Full Text
