On the development of evolutionary artificial artists
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Machado, P., Romero, J., Santos, A., Cardoso, A., Pazos, A.: On the development of evolutionary artificial artists. Computers & Graphics 31(6), 818–826 (2007)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2007.08.010
Abstract
The creation and the evaluation of aesthetic artifacts are tasks related to design, music and art, which are highly interesting from the computational point of view. Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence systems face the challenge of performing tasks that are typically human, highly subjective, and eventually social. The present paper introduces an architecture which is capable of evaluating aesthetic characteristics of artifacts and of creating artifacts that obey certain aesthetic properties. The development methodology and motivation, as well as the results achieved by the various components of the architecture, are described. The potential contributions of this type of systems in the context of digital art are also considered.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
[1] Moore DL. Ada: countess of lovelace. John Murray; 1977.
[2] Papadopoulos G, Wiggins G. AI methods for algorithmic composi- tion: a survey, a critical view and future prospects. In: Wiggins G, editor. AISB symposium on musical creativity, Edinburgh, UK, 1999.
[3] Harold C. The further exploits of aaron, painter. SEHR, Construc- tions of the Mind 1995;4(2).
[4] Baluja S, Pomerlau D, Todd J. Towards automated artificial evolution for computer-generated images. Connection Science 1994; 6(2):325–54.
[5] Stiny G, Gips J. Shape grammars and the generative specification of paintings and sculpture. In: Freiman CV, editor, Information processing, vol. 71. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co; 1971. p. 1460–5.
[6] Margaret AB. The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. New York: Basic Books; 1990.
[7] Csikszentmihalyi M. Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In: Handbook of creativity. Press Syndicate— Cambridge University, 1999, p. 313–35.
[8] Lewis M. Evolutionary visual art and design. In: The art of artificial evolution. Springer, 2007.
[9] Holland JH. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1975.
[10] Sims K. Artificial evolution for computer graphics. ACM Computer Graphics 1991;25:319–28.
[11] Cope D. The composer’s underscoring environment: Cue. Computer Music Journal 1997;21(3):20–37.
[12] Taylor RP, Micolich AP, Jonas D. Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings. Nature 1999;399:422.
[13] Li J, Datta R, Joshi D, Wang JZ. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006;3953:288–301.
[14] Castro L, Romero J, Machado P, Pazos A. Mquinas estticas. In: Proceedings of ARTTECH 2006. Pontevedra: Terceira conferencia Internacional de Arte Digital y Electrnica; 2006.
[15] Greenfield G. Co-evolutionary methods in evolutionary art. In: The art of artificial evolution. Springer, 2007.
[16] Machado P, Cardoso A. All the truth about NEvAr. Applied Intelligence, Special Issue on Creative Systems 2002;16(2):101–19.
[17] Koza JR. Genetic Programming: on the programming of computers by natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
[18] Machado P, Cardoso A. NEvAr—the assessment of an evolutionary art tool. In: Wiggins G, editor. Proceedings of AISB’00 symposium on creative and cultural aspects and applications of AI and cognitive science, Birmingham, UK, 2000.
[19] Machado P, Cardoso A. Computing aesthetics. In: Oliveira F, editor. XIVth Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence SBIA’98. LNAI Series. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Springer; 1998. p. 219–29.
[20] Moles A. Thorie de l’information et perception esthtique. Denoel, 1958.
[21] Arnheim R. Towards a psychology of art/entropy and art—an essay on disorder and order. The Regents of the University of California; 1966.
[22] Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF. The roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments. Spatial Vision 2000; 13(1):51–66.
[23] Tyler CW, editor. Human symmetry perception and its computa- tional analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
[24] Wertheimer M. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis WD, editor. A source book of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1939. p. 71–88.
[25] Machado P, Romero J, Cardoso A, Santos A. Partially interactive evolutionary artists. New generation computing—special issue on interactive evolutionary computation 2005;23(42):143–55.
[26] Romero J, Machado P, Santos A, Cardoso A. On the development of critics in evolutionary computation artists. In: Applications of evolutionary computing, LNCS. Essex, UK: Springer; 2003.
[27] Manaris B, Purewal T, McCormick C. Progress towards recognizing and classifying beautiful music with computers—midi-encoded music and the zipfmandelbrot law. In: Proceedings of the IEEE south- eastcon 2002 conference, Columbia, 2002.
[28] Zipf GK. Human behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: an introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley, 1949.
[29] Machado P, Romero J, Manaris B. Experiments in computational aesthetics. In: The art of artificicial evolution, Springer, 2007. [30] Machado P, Romero J, Santos A, Cardoso A, Manaris B. Adaptive critics for evolutionary artists. In: Applications of evolutionary computing, vol. 3005 of LNCS. Coimbra, Portugal: Springer; 2004. p. 435–44.
[31] Graves M. Design Judgement Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1948.
[32] Machado P. Inteligncia Artificial e Arte. Ph.D. thesis, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal (in Portuguese), 2007.
[33] Manaris B, Vaughan D, Wagner C, Romero J, Davis RB, Evolutionary music and the Zipf–Mandelbrot Law: progress towards developing fitness functions for pleasant music. EvoMU- SART2003—1st European Workshop on Evolutionary Music and Art, Essex, UK, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Applica- tions of Evolutionary Computing, LNCS 2611, 2003, Springer, p. 522–34.
[34] Manaris B, Roos P, Machado P, Krehbiel D, Pellicoro L, Romero J. A corpus-based hybrid approach to music analysis and composition. In: Proceedings of 22nd conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI- 07), Vancouver, 2007.
[35] Manaris B, Romero J, Machado P, Krehbiel D, Hirzel T, Pharr W, et al. Zipf’s law, music classification and aesthetics. Computer Music Journal 2005;29(1):55–69.
[36] Pazos A, Santos A, Arcay B, Dorado J, Romero J, Rodriguez J. An application framework for building evolutionary computer systems in music. Leonardo 2003;36(1):61–4.
[37] Romero J. Metodologa Evolutiva para la construccin de modelos cognitivos complejos. Exploracin de la creatividad artificial en composicin musical. Ph.D. thesis, University of Corunha, Corunha, Spain (in Spanish), 2002.
Links
Full Text
http://fmachado.dei.uc.pt/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/mrs+07.pdf
