Aesthetic and Mathematical Research: A Comparism with two Examples
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Tim Boykett: Aesthetic and Mathematical Research: A Comparism with two Examples. In: Bridges 2010. Pages 359–362
DOI
Abstract
This paper examines the emerging field of aesthetic research and my experience in two research projects. I would like to outline an argument that suggests that the methods of mathematical and aesthetic research may be more closely related to one another than they are to many other areas of research. In this process I will discuss why it is that the fields are, in my mind, closely related. In particular I would like to underline that research communication is not external to research practice, but an integral part of the research process.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
[1] Estelle Barrett and Barbara Bolt. Research as Practice: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. I.B.Tauris, 2007.
[2] Tim Boykett. Space from nonspace: Emergent spatiality in dynamic graphs. In Bridges Rennaisance 2005. MathArtFun Publishers, 2005.
[3] Joke Brouwer, Arjen Mulder, and Anne Nigten. aRt&D: Research and Development in Art. V2_NAi Publishers, 2005.
[4] Reg Cahill and Kirsty Kitto. Re-analysis of Michelson-Morley experiments reveals agreement with COBE cosmic background radiation preferred frame so impacting on interpretation of general relativity. apieron, 10:104–117, 2003.
[5] Reg Cahill and Christopher Klinger. Self-referential noise and the synthesis of three-dimensional space. General Relativity and Gravitation, 32(3):529 – 540, 2000.
[6] P. Carter. Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne University Publishing, 2005.
[7] J. Cerny, A. Piricka, and B. Rosenauerova. On directable automata. Kybernetika, 7:289–298, 1971.
[8] David Corfield. Towards a Philosophy of real mathematics. Cambridge, 2003.
[9] Dieter Daniels and Barbara U. Schmidt. Artists as Inventors - Inventors as Artists. Hatje Cantz Verlag, 2008.
[10] Alan Dunning and Paul Woodrow. Body degree zero: Anatomy of an interactive performance. In Transdisciplinary Digital Art: Sound Vision and the New Screen, pages 46–59. Springer Verlag Berlin, 2007.
[11] David Harel and Yehuda Koren. Graph drawing by high-dimensional embedding. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 2(8):195–214, 2004.
[12] Miao Jin, Feng Luo, Shing-Tung Yau, and Xianfeng Gu. Computing geodesic spectra of surfaces. In SPM ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Solid and physical modeling, pages 387–393, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[13] M. Kuzmanovic, Nik Gaffney, and Nat M ̈uller. txoom creative user research great yarmouth, 2003. http://lib.fo.am/project_txoom_user_research (accessed January 2010).
[14] G. Nagels. Space as a ’bucket of dust’. General Relativity and Gravitation, 17:545–557, 1985.
[15] G ̈unter Pilz. Near–rings. Number 23 in Mathematics Studies. North–Holland, 1983.
[16] G ̈unter Pilz. Near-rings and non-linear dynamical systems. In Gerhard Betsch, editor, Near-rings and Near-fields, pages 211–232. North-Holland, 1987.
[17] E.D. Sontag. Polynomial Response Maps, volume 13 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer Verlag Berlin, 1979.
[18] A.N. Trahtman. An eficient algorithm finds noticeable trends and examples concerning the cerny conjecture. In MFCS 2006, number 4162 in Lectures Notes in Computer Science, pages 789–800, 2006.
[19] A.N. Trahtman. The road colouring problem. Israel J. of Math., 172(1):51–60, 2009.
[20] Edward Tufte. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics Press, 1997.
[21] Various. Anchortronic - 5.1. Laboratory for Updating Experimental Sound. Staalplaat, 2003.
Links
Full Text
http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2010/bridges2010-359.pdf
