Guest editors’ introduction, Special Issue: Mathematical Models used in Aesthetic Evaluation
Greenfield, G., Machado, P.: Guest editors’ introduction, Special Issue: Mathematical Models used in Aesthetic Evaluation. J. Math. and the Arts 6(2-3), 59–64 (2012) DOI:
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2012.688185
DOI
Abstract
I often say when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowl- edge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind. — Lord Kelvin
Let proportion be found not only in numbers and measures, but also in sounds, weights, times, and positions, and whatever force there is. — Leonardo da Vinci
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
[1] E. Aboufadel, S. Boyenger, and C. Madsen, Digital creation of Chuck Close block-style portraits using wavelet filters, J. Math. Arts 4 (2010), pp. 291–211.
[2] S. Baluja, D. Pomerleau, and T. Jochem, Towards automated artificial evolution for computer-generated images, Connect. Sci. 6 (1994), pp. 325–354.
[3] K. Bentley, Exploring aesthetic pattern formation, GA ’02 Generative Arts Conference Proceedings, Milan, Italy, 2002, pp. 201–213.
[4] P. Bentley and D. Corne, Creative Evolutionary Systems, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2002.
[5] S. Bergen and B. Ross, Aesthetic 3D model evolution, in EvoMUSART 2012 Conference Proceedings, P. Machado et al., eds., LNCS 7247, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012, pp. 11–22.
[6] G. Birkhoff, Aesthetic Measure, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1933.
[7] A. Blackwell and N. Dodgson, Computational aesthetics as a negotiated boundary, LEONARDO 43 (2010), pp. 88–89.
[8] A. Coleman, The Digital Evolution. Visual Communications in the Electronic Age: Essays, Lectures and Interviews 1967–1998, Nazraeli Press, Tucson, AZ, 1998.
[9] E. den Heijer and A. Eben, Evolving art using multiple aesthetic measures, in EvoApplications 2011, Part II, C. Di Chio, et al., eds., LNCS 6625, Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp. 234–243.
[10] L. Feijs, Divisions of the plane by computer: Anotehr way of looking at Mondrain’s nonfigurative compositions, Leonardo 37 (2004), pp. 217–222.
[11] H. Franke, The computer — a new tool for visual art, Visual Comp. 4 (1988), pp. 35–39.
[12] G. Greenfield, An algorithmic palette tool, Tech. Rep. TR-94-01, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, 1994.
[13] G. Greenfield, Art and artifical life — a coevolutionary approach, in Artificial Life VII Conference Proceedings, M. Bedau et al., eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000, pp. 529–536.
[14] G. Greenfield, Evolving aesthetic images using multiobjective optimization, in Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, R. Sarker, et al., eds., IEEE Press, Canberra, 2003, pp. 1903–1909.
[15] G. Greenfield, Automating recolouring of evolved designs using evolved palettes, J. Math. Design 4 (2004), pp. 47–54.
[16] G. Greenfield, Evolutionary methods for ant colony paintings, in Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2005 Proceedings, F. Rothlauf, et al., eds., LNCS 3449, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005, pp. 478–487.
[17] G. Greenfield, On the origins of the term computational aesthetics, in Computational Aesthetics 2005, L. Neumann, et al., eds., Eurographics Association, ACM Press, New York, 2005, pp. 9–12.
[18] G. Greenfield, On evolving multi-pheromone ant paintings, 2006 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, WCCI06 Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, IEEE Press, 2006, pp. 7425–7431.
[19] G. Greenfield and M. Field, Post-process recolouring of time-based digital images, in V Mathematics & Design International Conference, M. Biembengut and V. de Spinadel, eds., Nova Letra, Blumenau, Brazil, 2007, pp. 71–76.
[20] G. Greenfield and P. Machado, Simulating artist and critic dynamics — an agent-based application of an evolutionary art system, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence, Funchal, Portugal, 5–7 October 2009, A. Dourado et al., eds., INSTICC Press, Setubal, Portugal, 2009, pp. 190–199.
[21] M. Jones and A. Agah, Evolution of digital images, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernet. 12 (2002), pp. 261–271.
[22] H. Kawano, What is computer art? in Artist and Computer, R. Leavitt, ed., Creative Computing Press, Morristown, NJ, 1976, pp. 112–113.
[23] S. Lee, S. Olsen, and B. Gooch, Simulating and analysing Jackson Pollock’s paintings, J. Math. Arts 1 (2007), pp. 73–83.
[24] V. Linkov and T. Staudek, Personality characteristics and aesthetic preference for chaotic curves, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Mathematics and Design, Mar del Plata, Argentina, 2004, pp. 297– 303.
[25] P. Machado and A. Cardoso, All the truth about NEvAr, Artif. Intell. 16 (2002), pp. 101–118.
[26] P. Machado, J. Romero, and B. Manaris, Experiments in computational aesthetics: an iterative approach to stylistic change in evolutionary art, in The Art of Artificial Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and Music, J. Romero and P. Machado, eds., Spinger-Verlag, Berlin, 2008, pp. 381–415.
[27] P. Machado, J. Romero, M. Santos, A. Cardoso, and B. Manaris, Adaptive critics for evolutionary artists, in EvoWorkshops 2004, G. Raidl, et al., eds., LNCS 3005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, pp. 437–446.
[28] J. McCormack, Open problems in evolutionary music and art, in EvoWorkshops 2005, F. Rothlauf, et al., eds., LNCS 3449, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005, pp. 428–436.
[29] F. Nake, Art in the time of the artificial, LEONARDO 31 (1998), pp. 163–164.
[30] A. Noll, Human or machine: a subjective comparison of Piet Mondrian’s Composition with Lines and a computer-generated picture, Psycholog. Rec. 16 (1966), pp. 1–10.
[31] C. Pickover (ed.), Chaos and Fractals: A Computer Graphical Journey, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
[32] R. Saunders and J. Gero, A curious design agent, in CAADRIA 2001, J. Gero, et al., eds., Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney, Austalia, 2001, pp. 345–350.
[33] K. Sims, Artificial evolution for computer graphics, Proceedings SIGGRAPH ’91, Vol. 25, ACM Press, New York, 1991, pp. 319–328.
[34] J. Sprott, Automatic generation of strange attractors, Comp. Graphics 17 (1993), pp. 325–332.
[35] J. Sprott, Automatic generation of iterated function systems, Comp. Graphics 18 (1994), pp. 417–425.
Links
Full Text
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17513472.2012.688185
