Hybrid Biological-Digital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Version vom 25. November 2015, 15:42 Uhr von Gubachelier (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Reference == van Eck, Wim, Lamers, Lamers, Maarten H. (2013) Hybrid Biological-Digital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing. Leonardo 46:2 p…“)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

van Eck, Wim, Lamers, Lamers, Maarten H. (2013) Hybrid Biological-Digital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing. Leonardo 46:2 pp. 151-158

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00530

Abstract

The authors give an overview of existing incorporations of biological systems for behavior generation within digital systems. The authors investigate digital systems that have artistic and/or entertainment goals, including computer games. The overview concludes with a reflection on the overall state of this hybrid approach.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@article{
author = {van Eck, Wim, Lamers, Lamers, Maarten H.},
title = {Hybrid Biological-Digital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing},
journal = {Leonardo},
year = {2013},
year = {46:2},
month = {January},
pages = {151-158},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00530, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Hybrid_Biological-Digital_Systems_in_Artistic_and_Entertainment_Computing },
publisher = {MIT Press},
}

Used References

1. B.F. Skinner, “Pigeons in a Pelican,” American Psychologist, Vol. 15, No. 1, 28–37 (1960). An article recommended for its entertaining anecdotes as well as for Skinner’s view on unconventional scientific ideas.

2. Leonard M. Adleman, “Computing with DNA,” Scientific American, Vol. 279, No. 8, 54–61 (1998).

3.

 Tetsu  Saigusa  et  al.,  “Amoebae  Anticipate  Peri

- odic Events,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, No. 018101 (2008).

4.

David Weibel et al., “Playing Online Games against 

Computer- vs. Human-controlled Opponents: Ef - fects on Presence, Flow and Enjoyment,” Comput - ers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2274–-2291 (2008).

5.

Duane M. Rumbaugh, W. Kirk Richardson, David 

A. Washburn, “Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Video Tasks, and Implications for Stimulus-Response Spatial Contiguity,” Journal of Comparative Psychol - ogy, Vol. 103, No. 1, 32–38 (1989).

6.

David A. Washburn, Michael J. Rulon, Jonathan 

P. Gulledge, “A new breed of computer users: Rats control a cursor via joystick manipulation,” Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 36, 173–179 (2004).

7.

Jose M. Camena, Mikhail A. Lebedev, Roy E. Crist, 

et al., “Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates,” PLoS Biol - ogy, Vol. 1, No. 2, 193–208 (2003).

8.

Ken Rinaldo, “Augmented Fish Reality” (2004). 

Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and De - sign website. Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <http://accad. osu.edu/~rinaldo/works/augmented/augmented. html>.

9.

Garnet Hertz, “Cockroach Controlled Mobile Ro

- bot” (2004). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.conceptlab. com/roachbot>.

10.

S. Tsuda, K.P. Zauner, Y.P. Gunji, “Robot control: 

From silicon circuitry to cells,” BioADIT 2006, LNCS Vol. 3853, 20–32 (2006).

11.

 Thomas  DeMarse,  Karl  P.  Dockendorf,  “Adap

- tive Flight Control with Living Neuronal Networks on Microelectrode Arrays,” Neural Networks, Vol. 3, 1548–-1551 (2005).

12.

Douglas J. Bakkum, Philip M. Gamblen, Guy Ben-

Ary, Zenas C. Chao, Steve M. Potter, “MEART: The semi-living artist,” Frontiers in NeuroRobotics, Vol. 1, No. 5, 1–10 (2007).

13.

Bakkum et al. [12], p. 9.

14.

Isao Shimoyama, Raphael Holzer, “Locomotion 

control of a bio-robotic system via electric stimula - tion,” Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol. 3, 1514– 1519 (1997).

15.

 Andy  Gracie,  Brian  Lee  Yung  Rowe,  “Tighten

- ing the Loop: From Machine-Nature Communica - tion Towards Symbiosis,” FLAIRS 2005, AAAI Press, 63–67 (2005).

16.

Arthur Elsenaar, Remko Scha, “Electric Body Ma

- nipulation as Performance Art: A Historical Perspec - tive,” Leonardo Music Journal, Vol. 12, 17–28 (2002).

17.

Eduardo Kac, 

Teleporting an Unknown State

(Mari

- bor: KIBLA, 1998).

18.

Ken Goldberg, 

The Robot in the Garden: Telerobot - ics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet (Cam - bridge: The MIT Press, 2000).

19.

 Philip  Ross,  “Junior  Return”  (2005).  Accessed 

12 Jan. 2011 <http://billhoss.phpwebhosting.com/ ross/index.php?jun>.

20.

 Nicola  Toffolini,  “It’s  Raining,  Naturally:  Mak

- ing Good and Bad Weather” (2003). LipanjePuntin website. Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.lipanjepuntin. com/desc.php?id_autore=60>.

21.

Matthew Kenyon, Douglas Easterly, “Spore 1.1,” 

ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Emerging technologies (2005).

22.

Matthew Kenyon, Douglas Easterly, Tiago Rorke, 

“Tardigotchi” (2009). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www. tardigotchi.com>.

23.

Amy Youngs, “Rearming the Spineless Opuntia” 

(1999). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <http://hypernatural. com/rearm.html>.

24.

 T.  Nakagaki,  H.  Yamada,  A.  Tóth,  “Path  find

- ing by tube morphogenesis in an amoeboid organism,” Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 92, No. 1–2, 47–52 (2001).

25.

 A.  Tero  et  al.,  “Rules  for  Biologically  Inspired 

Adaptive Network Design,” Science, Vol. 327, No. 5964, 439–442 (2010).

26.

Leif Brush, “Meadow Piano” (1972). University 

of Minnesota Duluth website. Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.d.umn.edu/~lbrush>.

27.

 Nicholas  Negroponte,  “Toward  a  Theory  of 

Architecture Machines,” Journal of Architec - tural Education (1947–1974), Vol. 23, No. 2, 9–12 (1969).

28.

EDHV, “Debug” (2009). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 

<www.edhv.nl/edhv/?p=3346>.

29.

Mateusz Herczka, “Life Support Systems: Vanda” 

(2005). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.mateuszherczka. net/main/?page_id=241>.

30.

 Antony  Hall,  “ENKI”  (2005).  Accessed  12  Jan. 

2011 <www.antonyhall.net/ENKItech/introduction. html>.

31.

Angelo Vermeulen, 

Biomodd

(2007). Accessed 12 

Jan. 2011 <www.biomodd.net>.

32.

 Stephen  Wilson,  “Protozoa  Games”  (2003). 

San Francisco State University website. Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~swilson/art/ protozoagames/protogames10.html>.

33.

 Roger  K.C.  Tan,  Adrian  David  Cheok,  James 

K.S. Teh, “Mixed Reality Environment for Playing Computer Games with Pets,” The International Journal of Virtual Reality, Vol. 5, No. 3, 53–58 (2006).

34.

  Dan   Young,   “Lumberjacked”   (2005).   We 

Make Money Not Art website. Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <http://we-make-money-not-art.com/ archives/2005/11/lumberjacked-al.php>.

35.

 Bunky  Boger,  “The  Tic-Tac-Toe  Chicken  Chal

- lenge.” Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.casinochicken. com>.

36.

Gerald M. Levitt, 

The Turk, Chess Automaton

(Jef

- ferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2000) 37.

Wim van Eck, Maarten H. Lamers, “Animal Con

- trolled Computer Games: Playing Pac-Man against Real Crickets,” ICEC 2006, LNCS Vol. 4161, 31–36 (2006).

38.

Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse et al., “Design, Engineer

- ing and Utility of Biotic Games,” Lab on a Chip, Vol. 11, 14–22 (2011).

39.

Skinner [1], pp. 36–37.

40.

Skinner [1], p. 31.

41.

Hertz [9]; Tsuda et al. [10]; DeMarse and Dock

- endorf [11]; Bakkum et al. [12]; Gracie and Rowe [15]; van Eck and Lamers [37].

42.

 Garnet  Hertz,  “Ethology  of  Art  and  Science 

Collaborations: Research Ethics Boards in the Con- text of Contemporary Art Practice,” Lecture Notes (2002). Accessed 12 Jan. 2011 <www.conceptlab.com/ ethology/hertz-ethology-notes-v20081124.pdf>.

43.

From Skinner [1]; content is public domain.

44.

From Tero et al. [25]


Links

Full Text

http://mediatechnology.leiden.edu/images/uploads/docs/vaneck-lamers-hybrid-biological-digital-systems-in-artistic-and-entertainment-computing.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links