Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ == Referenz == Chatterjee, A.: Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(1) (2011) 53-62 == DOI == http://dx.doi.org/10.…“)
 
 
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 112: Zeile 112:
 
Conway, B. R., & Livingstone, M. S. (2007). Perspectives on
 
Conway, B. R., & Livingstone, M. S. (2007). Perspectives on
 
science and art. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17,
 
science and art. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17,
−
476–482.
+
476–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.010
  
 
Cunningham, M., Barbee, A., & Philhower, C. (2002).
 
Cunningham, M., Barbee, A., & Philhower, C. (2002).
Zeile 123: Zeile 123:
 
(2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control
 
(2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control
 
and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain
 
and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain
−
and Cognition, 70, 84–91.
+
and Cognition, 70, 84–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
  
 
de Tommaso, M., Sardaro, M., & Livrea, P. (2008). Aesthetic
 
de Tommaso, M., Sardaro, M., & Livrea, P. (2008). Aesthetic
 
value of paintings affects pain thresholds. Consciousness and
 
value of paintings affects pain thresholds. Consciousness and
−
Cognition, 17, 1152–1162.
+
Cognition, 17, 1152–1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.002
  
 
Delgado, M., Nystrom, L., Fissell, K., Noll, D., & Fiez, J. (2000).
 
Delgado, M., Nystrom, L., Fissell, K., Noll, D., & Fiez, J. (2000).
Zeile 135: Zeile 135:
 
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is
 
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is
 
good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24,
 
good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24,
−
285–290.
+
285–290. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0033731
  
 
Dissanayake, E. (2008). The arts after Darwin: Does art have
 
Dissanayake, E. (2008). The arts after Darwin: Does art have
 
an origin and adaptive function? In K. Zijlemans & W. van
 
an origin and adaptive function? In K. Zijlemans & W. van
 
Damme (Eds.), World art studies: Exploring concepts and
 
Damme (Eds.), World art studies: Exploring concepts and
−
approaches (pp. 241–263). Amsterdam: Valiz.
+
approaches (pp. 241–263). Amsterdam: Valiz.  
  
 
Elliott, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. (2000). Dissociable neural
 
Elliott, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. (2000). Dissociable neural
Zeile 147: Zeile 147:
  
 
Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution.
 
Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution.
−
Nature, 372, 169–172.
+
Nature, 372, 169–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/372169a0
  
 
Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York: Anchor
 
Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York: Anchor
Zeile 153: Zeile 153:
  
 
Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The empirical determination of an
 
Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The empirical determination of an
−
aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83–92.
+
aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83–92. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0062483
  
 
Eysenck, H. J., & Hawker, G. W. (1994). The taxonomy of visual
 
Eysenck, H. J., & Hawker, G. W. (1994). The taxonomy of visual
Zeile 161: Zeile 161:
 
Fairhall, S. L., & Ishai, A. (2008). Neural correlates of object
 
Fairhall, S. L., & Ishai, A. (2008). Neural correlates of object
 
indeterminacy in art compositions. Consciousness and
 
indeterminacy in art compositions. Consciousness and
−
Cognition, 17, 923–932.
+
Cognition, 17, 923–932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.005
  
 
Farah, M. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision. Malden,
 
Farah, M. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision. Malden,
Zeile 173: Zeile 173:
 
Graham, D. J., & Field, D. J. (2007). Statistical regularities of
 
Graham, D. J., & Field, D. J. (2007). Statistical regularities of
 
art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and
 
art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and
−
nonlinearities. Spatial Vision, 21, 149–164.
+
nonlinearities. Spatial Vision, 21, 149–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753877
  
 
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003).
 
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003).
 
Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of
 
Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of
−
beauty. Biological Review, 78, 385–407.
+
beauty. Biological Review, 78, 385–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102006085
  
 
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens)
 
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens)
 
facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of
 
facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of
 
symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative
 
symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative
−
Psychology, 108, 233–242.
+
Psychology, 108, 233–242. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1994-45035-001
  
 
Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ros, W. D. (1997). Visual brain
 
Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ros, W. D. (1997). Visual brain
 
and visual perception: How does the cortex do perceptual
 
and visual perception: How does the cortex do perceptual
−
grouping? Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 106–111.
+
grouping? Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 106–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)01002-8
  
 
Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The art of visual
 
Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The art of visual
−
neglect. Lancet, 350, 139–140.
+
neglect. Lancet, 350, 139–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03165-6
  
 
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye
 
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye
 
of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal
 
of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal
−
of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407.
+
of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423013
  
 
Heller, W. (1994). Cognitive and emotional organization of
 
Heller, W. (1994). Cognitive and emotional organization of
Zeile 203: Zeile 203:
 
of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional
 
of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional
 
processes? International Journal of Psychophysiology,
 
processes? International Journal of Psychophysiology,
−
65, 20–31.
+
65, 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.02.007
  
 
Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
 
Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
−
International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 181–185.
+
International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 181–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010
  
 
Ishai, A., Fairhall, S., & Pepperell, R. (2007). Perception,
 
Ishai, A., Fairhall, S., & Pepperell, R. (2007). Perception,
 
memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Brain Research
 
memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Brain Research
−
Bulletin, 73, 319–324.
+
Bulletin, 73, 319–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.04.009
  
 
Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences: A
 
Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences: A
 
framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39,
 
framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39,
−
155–162.
+
155–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155
  
 
Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Kohler, M., & Schroger, E. (2004).
 
Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Kohler, M., & Schroger, E. (2004).
 
The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects.
 
The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects.
−
Psychological Reports, 94, 1253–1260.
+
Psychological Reports, 94, 1253–1260.  
  
 
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R., Hofel, L., & von Cramon, D. (2005).
 
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R., Hofel, L., & von Cramon, D. (2005).
 
Brain correlates of aesthetic judgments of beauty.
 
Brain correlates of aesthetic judgments of beauty.
−
Neuroimage, 29, 276–285.
+
Neuroimage, 29, 276–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
  
 
Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in
 
Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in
−
five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296.
+
five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02692202
  
 
Jung, R. (1974). Neuropsychologie und neurophysiologie
 
Jung, R. (1974). Neuropsychologie und neurophysiologie
Zeile 233: Zeile 233:
  
 
Kampe, K., Frith, C., Dolan, R., & Frith, U. (2001). Reward value
 
Kampe, K., Frith, C., Dolan, R., & Frith, U. (2001). Reward value
−
of attractiveness and gaze. Nature, 413, 589.
+
of attractiveness and gaze. Nature, 413, 589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35098149
  
 
Kant, I. (1790/1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar,
 
Kant, I. (1790/1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar,
Zeile 239: Zeile 239:
  
 
Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty.
 
Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty.
−
Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699–1705.
+
Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699–1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00696.2003
  
 
Kenealy, P., Frude, N., & Shaw, W. (1988). Influence of
 
Kenealy, P., Frude, N., & Shaw, W. (1988). Influence of
 
childrenʼs physical attractiveness on teacher expectations.
 
childrenʼs physical attractiveness on teacher expectations.
−
Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 373–383.
+
Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 373–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9713754
  
 
Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated
 
Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated
−
by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16, 63–68.
+
by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16, 63–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070
  
 
Kwon, J., Kinm, J., Lee, D., Lee, J., Lee, D., Kim, M., et al. (2003).
 
Kwon, J., Kinm, J., Lee, D., Lee, J., Lee, D., Kim, M., et al. (2003).
 
Neural correlates of clinical symptoms and cognitive
 
Neural correlates of clinical symptoms and cognitive
 
dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry
 
dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry
−
Research, 122, 37–47.
+
Research, 122, 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00104-X
  
 
Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A., Larson, A., Hallam, M.,
 
Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A., Larson, A., Hallam, M.,
 
& Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty: A
 
& Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty: A
 
meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin,
 
meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin,
−
126, 390–423.
+
126, 390–423. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=2000-15386-005
  
 
Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S.
 
Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S.
 
(1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive
 
(1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive
−
faces. Developmental Psychology, 27, 79–84.
+
faces. Developmental Psychology, 27, 79–84. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1991-12212-001
  
 
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A
 
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A
 
model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.
 
model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.
−
British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.
+
British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
  
 
Lerner, R., Lerner, J., Hess, L., & Schwab, J. (1991). Physical
 
Lerner, R., Lerner, J., Hess, L., & Schwab, J. (1991). Physical
 
attractiveness and psychosocial functioning among early
 
attractiveness and psychosocial functioning among early
−
adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 300–320.
+
adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 300–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431691113001
  
 
Livingstone, M. (2002). Vision and art: The biology of seeing.
 
Livingstone, M. (2002). Vision and art: The biology of seeing.
Zeile 275: Zeile 275:
 
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form,
 
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form,
 
colour, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and
 
colour, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and
−
perception. Science, 240, 740–749.
+
perception. Science, 240, 740–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3283936
  
 
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical
 
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical
Zeile 284: Zeile 284:
 
Locher, P. J., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (1999). An
 
Locher, P. J., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (1999). An
 
empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial
 
empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial
−
composition. Acta Psychologica, 103, 261–280.
+
composition. Acta Psychologica, 103, 261–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00044-X
  
 
Lythgoe, M., Polak, T., Kalmus, M., de Haan, M., & Khean
 
Lythgoe, M., Polak, T., Kalmus, M., de Haan, M., & Khean
 
Chong, W. (2005). Obsessive, prolific artistic output following
 
Chong, W. (2005). Obsessive, prolific artistic output following
−
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology, 64, 397–398.
+
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology, 64, 397–398.  
  
 
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the
 
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the
Zeile 300: Zeile 300:
 
Miller, B., & Hou, C. (2004). Portraits of artists: Emergence
 
Miller, B., & Hou, C. (2004). Portraits of artists: Emergence
 
of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61,
 
of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61,
−
842–844.
+
842–844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.6.842
  
 
Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F.,
 
Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F.,
Zeile 309: Zeile 309:
 
C. J. (2008). Towards a framework for the study of the neural
 
C. J. (2008). Towards a framework for the study of the neural
 
correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision, 21,
 
correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision, 21,
−
379–396.
+
379–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856808784532653
  
 
OʼDoherty, J., Kringelbach, M., Rolls, E., Hornack, J., &
 
OʼDoherty, J., Kringelbach, M., Rolls, E., Hornack, J., &
 
Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment
 
Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment
 
representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature
 
representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature
−
Neuroscience, 4, 95–102.
+
Neuroscience, 4, 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/82959
  
 
OʼDoherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perret, D., Burt, D., &
 
OʼDoherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perret, D., Burt, D., &
 
Dolan, R. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of orbitofrontal
 
Dolan, R. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of orbitofrontal
 
cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41,
 
cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41,
−
147–155.
+
147–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8
  
 
Olson, I., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is
 
Olson, I., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is
−
appraised in a glance. Emotion, 5, 498–502.
+
appraised in a glance. Emotion, 5, 498–502. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=2005-15801-011
  
 
Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind?
 
Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind?
 
A review of how face perception and attention interact.
 
A review of how face perception and attention interact.
−
Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92.
+
Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.025
  
 
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S.,
 
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S.,
Zeile 332: Zeile 332:
 
dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial
 
dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial
 
attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,
 
attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,
−
Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 1617–1623.
+
Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 1617–1623.  
  
 
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape
 
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape
 
and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368,
 
and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368,
−
239–242.
+
239–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/368239a0
  
 
Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred
 
Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred
 
from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10,
 
from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10,
−
59–63.
+
59–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
  
 
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art:
 
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art:
Zeile 348: Zeile 348:
 
Redies, C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception
 
Redies, C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception
 
based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spatial
 
based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spatial
−
Vision, 21, 97–117.
+
Vision, 21, 97–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753886
  
 
Rentschler, I., Jüttner, M., Unzicker, A., & Landis, T. (1999).
 
Rentschler, I., Jüttner, M., Unzicker, A., & Landis, T. (1999).
 
Innate and learned components of human visual preference.
 
Innate and learned components of human visual preference.
−
Current Biology, 9, 665–671.
+
Current Biology, 9, 665–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80306-6
  
 
Ricci, R., Vaishnavi, S., & Chatterjee, A. (1999). A deficit of
 
Ricci, R., Vaishnavi, S., & Chatterjee, A. (1999). A deficit of
 
preattentive vision: Experimental observations and
 
preattentive vision: Experimental observations and
−
theoretical implications. Neurocase, 5, 1–12.
+
theoretical implications. Neurocase, 5, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13554799908404059
  
 
Ritts, V., Patterson, M., & Tubbs, M. (1992). Expectations,
 
Ritts, V., Patterson, M., & Tubbs, M. (1992). Expectations,
 
impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students:
 
impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students:
−
A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413–426.
+
A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413–426.  
  
 
Russell, P. A., & George, D. A. (1990). Relationships between
 
Russell, P. A., & George, D. A. (1990). Relationships between
Zeile 377: Zeile 377:
 
subcortical metabolic changes and predictors of response
 
subcortical metabolic changes and predictors of response
 
to paroxetine treatment in obsessive–compulsive disorder.
 
to paroxetine treatment in obsessive–compulsive disorder.
−
Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, 683–693.
+
Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, 683–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00082-2
  
 
Schnider, A., Regard, M., Benson, D. F., & Landis, T. (1993).
 
Schnider, A., Regard, M., Benson, D. F., & Landis, T. (1993).
 
Effect of a right-hemisphere stroke on an artistʼs
 
Effect of a right-hemisphere stroke on an artistʼs
 
performance. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, &
 
performance. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, &
−
Behavioral Neurology, 6, 249–255.
+
Behavioral Neurology, 6, 249–255.  
  
 
Schultz, W., Dayans, P., & Montague, P. (1997). A neural
 
Schultz, W., Dayans, P., & Montague, P. (1997). A neural
−
substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599.
+
substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593
  
 
Selfe, L. (1977). Nadia. A case of extraordinary drawing
 
Selfe, L. (1977). Nadia. A case of extraordinary drawing
Zeile 391: Zeile 391:
  
 
Senior, C. (2003). Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron,
 
Senior, C. (2003). Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron,
−
38, 525–528.
+
38, 525–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00293-9
  
 
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings
 
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings
Zeile 401: Zeile 401:
 
Butterworth, G., Parsons, S., et al. (1998). Newborn infants
 
Butterworth, G., Parsons, S., et al. (1998). Newborn infants
 
prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development,
 
prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development,
−
21, 345–354.
+
21, 345–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90011-X
  
 
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford,
 
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford,
Zeile 407: Zeile 407:
  
 
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness.
 
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness.
−
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–260.
+
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5
  
 
Tinbergen, N. (1954). Curious naturalist. New York: Basic
 
Tinbergen, N. (1954). Curious naturalist. New York: Basic
Zeile 419: Zeile 419:
 
Ursu, S., Stenger, V., Shear, M., Jones, M., & Carter, C. S. (2003).
 
Ursu, S., Stenger, V., Shear, M., Jones, M., & Carter, C. S. (2003).
 
Overactive action monitoring in obsessive–compulsive
 
Overactive action monitoring in obsessive–compulsive
−
disorder. Psychological Science, 14, 347–353.
+
disorder. Psychological Science, 14, 347–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.24411
  
 
Van Essen, D. C., Feleman, D. J., DeYoe, E. A., Ollavaria, J., &
 
Van Essen, D. C., Feleman, D. J., DeYoe, E. A., Ollavaria, J., &
Zeile 433: Zeile 433:
 
Vecera, S., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Spatial attention does
 
Vecera, S., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Spatial attention does
 
not require preattentive grouping. Neuropsychology, 11,
 
not require preattentive grouping. Neuropsychology, 11,
−
30–43.
+
30–43. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1997-08159-003
  
 
Waldman, P. (2000, May 12, Friday). Master stroke: A tragedy
 
Waldman, P. (2000, May 12, Friday). Master stroke: A tragedy
Zeile 445: Zeile 445:
 
Wiesmann, M., & Ishai, A. (2008). Recollection- and familiaritybased
 
Wiesmann, M., & Ishai, A. (2008). Recollection- and familiaritybased
 
decisions reflect memory strength. Frontiers in
 
decisions reflect memory strength. Frontiers in
−
Systems Neuroscience, 2, 1–9.
+
Systems Neuroscience, 2, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.001.2008
  
 
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to
 
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to
Zeile 453: Zeile 453:
 
Winston, J., OʼDoherty, J., Kilner, J., Perrett, D., & Dolan, R.
 
Winston, J., OʼDoherty, J., Kilner, J., Perrett, D., & Dolan, R.
 
(2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness.
 
(2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness.
−
Neuropsychologia, 45, 195–206.
+
Neuropsychologia, 45, 195–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009
  
 
Woods, W. A. (1991). Parameters of aesthetic objects: Applied
 
Woods, W. A. (1991). Parameters of aesthetic objects: Applied
−
aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 105–114.
+
aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 105–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7D3X-03G1-AGUV-W417
  
 
Wyvell, C., & Berridge, K. (2000). Intra-accumbens
 
Wyvell, C., & Berridge, K. (2000). Intra-accumbens
Zeile 465: Zeile 465:
  
 
Yago, E., & Ishai, A. (2006). Recognition memory is modulated
 
Yago, E., & Ishai, A. (2006). Recognition memory is modulated
−
by visual similarity. Neuroimage, 31, 807–817.
+
by visual similarity. Neuroimage, 31, 807–817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.014
  
 
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle:
 
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle:

Aktuelle Version vom 27. Juni 2016, 21:38 Uhr

Referenz

Chatterjee, A.: Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(1) (2011) 53-62

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21457

Abstract

Neuroaesthetics is gaining momentum. At this early juncture, it is worth taking stock of where the field is and what lies ahead. Here, I review writings that fall under the rubric of neuroaesthetics. These writings include discussions of the parallel organizational principles of the brain and the intent and practices of artists, the description of informative anecdotes, and the emergence of experimental neuroaesthetics. I then suggest a few areas within neuroaesthetics that might be pursued profitably. Finally, I raise some challenges for the field. These challenges are not unique to neuroaesthetics. As neuroaesthetics comes of age, it might take advantage of the lessons learned from more mature domains of inquiry within cognitive neuroscience.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@article{
author = {Chatterjee, Anjan},
title = {Neuroaesthetics: A Coming of Age Story},
journal = {Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
volume = {23},
number = {1},
pages = {53-62},
year = {2011},
keywords={}
doi={http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21457},
url={http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jocn.2010.21457 http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Neuroaesthetics:_a_coming_of_age_story},
}

Used References

Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C., OʼConnor, E., & Breiter, H. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537–551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3

Berridge, K., & Kringelbach, M. (2008). Affective neuroscience of pleasure: Reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology, 199, 457–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1099-6

Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90014-F

Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006). Perceptual pleasure and the brain. American Scientist, 94, 247–253.

Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., & Landis, T. (2003). Color neglect in an artist. Lancet, 361, 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12304-5

Breiter, H., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural response to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00303-8

Brown, J. (1977). Mind, brain, and consciousness. The neuropsychology of cognition. New York: Academic Press.

Brown, S., & Dissanayake, E. (2009). The arts are more than aesthetics: Neuroaesthetics as narrow aesthetics. In M. Skov & O. Vartanian (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 43–57). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.

Cantagallo, A., & Sala, S. D. (1998). Preserved insight in an artist with extrapersonal spatial neglect. Cortex, 34, 163–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70746-9

Cavanagh, P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 434, 301–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/434301a

Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J., Munar, E., Maestu, F., Nadal, M., Capo, M. A., et al. (2009). Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 106, 3847–3852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900304106

Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Maestu, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernandez, A., et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 101, 6321–6325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401427101

Chatterjee, A. (2002). Universal and relative aesthetics: A framework from cognitive neuroscience. Paper presented at the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, August 4–8, 2002, Takarazuka, Japan.

Chatterjee, A. (2003). Neglect. A disorder of spatial attention. In M. DʼEsposito (Ed.), Neurological foundations of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chatterjee, A. (2004a). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4, 55–59.

Chatterjee, A. (2004b). The neuropsychology of visual artists. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1568–1583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.011

Chatterjee, A. (2006). The neuropsychology of visual art: Conferring capacity. International Review of Neurobiology, 74, 39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(06)74003-X

Chatterjee, A. (2009). Prospects for a neuropsychology of art. In M. Skov & O. Vartanian (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 131–143). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.

Chatterjee, A., Hamilton, R. H., & Amorapanth, P. X. (2006). Art produced by a patient with Parkinsonʼs disease. Behavioural Neurology, 17, 105–108.

Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology, 23, 135–143. http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0014430

Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., II, & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 207–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.f

Conway, B. R., & Livingstone, M. S. (2007). Perspectives on science and art. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 476–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.010

Cunningham, M., Barbee, A., & Philhower, C. (2002). Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. In G. Rhodes & L. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness. Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 193–238). Westport, CT: Ablex.

Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70, 84–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003

de Tommaso, M., Sardaro, M., & Livrea, P. (2008). Aesthetic value of paintings affects pain thresholds. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1152–1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.002

Delgado, M., Nystrom, L., Fissell, K., Noll, D., & Fiez, J. (2000). Tracking the hemodynamic responses for reward and punishment. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 3072–3077.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0033731

Dissanayake, E. (2008). The arts after Darwin: Does art have an origin and adaptive function? In K. Zijlemans & W. van Damme (Eds.), World art studies: Exploring concepts and approaches (pp. 241–263). Amsterdam: Valiz.

Elliott, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. (2000). Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6159–6165.

Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature, 372, 169–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/372169a0

Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York: Anchor Books.

Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83–92. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0062483

Eysenck, H. J., & Hawker, G. W. (1994). The taxonomy of visual aesthetic preferences: An empirical study. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 95–101.

Fairhall, S. L., & Ishai, A. (2008). Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art compositions. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 923–932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.005

Farah, M. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Fechner, G. (1860). Elements of psychophysics (H. Adler, Trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Gardner, H. (1975). The shattered mind. The person after brain damage. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Graham, D. J., & Field, D. J. (2007). Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities. Spatial Vision, 21, 149–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753877

Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Review, 78, 385–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102006085

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1994-45035-001

Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ros, W. D. (1997). Visual brain and visual perception: How does the cortex do perceptual grouping? Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 106–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(96)01002-8

Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The art of visual neglect. Lancet, 350, 139–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03165-6

Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423013

Heller, W. (1994). Cognitive and emotional organization of the brain: Influences on the creation and perception of art. In D. Zaidel (Ed.), Neuropsychology (pp. 271–292). New York: Academic Press.

Hofel, L., & Jacobsen, T. (2007). Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.02.007

Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 181–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010

Ishai, A., Fairhall, S., & Pepperell, R. (2007). Perception, memory and aesthetics of indeterminate art. Brain Research Bulletin, 73, 319–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.04.009

Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences: A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39, 155–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155

Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Kohler, M., & Schroger, E. (2004). The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports, 94, 1253–1260.

Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R., Hofel, L., & von Cramon, D. (2005). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgments of beauty. Neuroimage, 29, 276–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010

Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02692202

Jung, R. (1974). Neuropsychologie und neurophysiologie des konturund formsehens in zeichnerei und malerei. In H. Weick (Ed.), Pyschopathologie Mususcher Gestaltungen (pp. 27–88). Stuttgart: FK Shattauer.

Kampe, K., Frith, C., Dolan, R., & Frith, U. (2001). Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature, 413, 589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35098149

Kant, I. (1790/1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699–1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00696.2003

Kenealy, P., Frude, N., & Shaw, W. (1988). Influence of childrenʼs physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 373–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9713754

Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16, 63–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070

Kwon, J., Kinm, J., Lee, D., Lee, J., Lee, D., Kim, M., et al. (2003). Neural correlates of clinical symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 122, 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00104-X

Langlois, J., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=2000-15386-005

Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27, 79–84. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1991-12212-001

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811

Lerner, R., Lerner, J., Hess, L., & Schwab, J. (1991). Physical attractiveness and psychosocial functioning among early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 300–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431691113001

Livingstone, M. (2002). Vision and art: The biology of seeing. New York: Abrams.

Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, colour, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3283936

Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.

Locher, P. J., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition. Acta Psychologica, 103, 261–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00044-X

Lythgoe, M., Polak, T., Kalmus, M., de Haan, M., & Khean Chong, W. (2005). Obsessive, prolific artistic output following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology, 64, 397–398.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: WH Freeman and Company.

Marsh, G. G., & Philwin, B. (1987). Unilateral neglect and constructional apraxia in a right-handed artist with a left posterior lesion. Cortex, 23, 149–155.

Miller, B., & Hou, C. (2004). Portraits of artists: Emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61, 842–844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.6.842

Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M., et al. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982.

Nadal, M., Munar, E., Capo, M. A., Rosselo, J., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2008). Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision, 21, 379–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856808784532653

OʼDoherty, J., Kringelbach, M., Rolls, E., Hornack, J., & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/82959

OʼDoherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perret, D., Burt, D., & Dolan, R. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41, 147–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8

Olson, I., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion, 5, 498–502. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=2005-15801-011

Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.025

Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M., et al. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 1617–1623.

Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/368239a0

Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004

Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15–51.

Redies, C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spatial Vision, 21, 97–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753886

Rentschler, I., Jüttner, M., Unzicker, A., & Landis, T. (1999). Innate and learned components of human visual preference. Current Biology, 9, 665–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80306-6

Ricci, R., Vaishnavi, S., & Chatterjee, A. (1999). A deficit of preattentive vision: Experimental observations and theoretical implications. Neurocase, 5, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13554799908404059

Ritts, V., Patterson, M., & Tubbs, M. (1992). Expectations, impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413–426.

Russell, P. A., & George, D. A. (1990). Relationships between aesthetic response scales applied to paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 15–30.

Sacks, O. (1995a). Prodigies. In An anthropologist on Mars (pp. 188–243). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Sacks, O. (1995b). The landscape of his dreams. In An anthropologist on Mars (pp. 153–187). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Saxena, S., Brody, A., Maidment, K., Dunkin, J., Colgan, M., Alborzian, S., et al. (1999). Localized orbitofrontal and subcortical metabolic changes and predictors of response to paroxetine treatment in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, 683–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00082-2

Schnider, A., Regard, M., Benson, D. F., & Landis, T. (1993). Effect of a right-hemisphere stroke on an artistʼs performance. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 6, 249–255.

Schultz, W., Dayans, P., & Montague, P. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593

Selfe, L. (1977). Nadia. A case of extraordinary drawing ability in an autistic child. New York: Academic Press.

Senior, C. (2003). Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron, 38, 525–528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00293-9

Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482. Skov, M., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.) (2009). Neuroaesthetics. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.

Slater, A., Schulenburg, C. V. D., Brown, E., Badenoch, M., Butterworth, G., Parsons, S., et al. (1998). Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 345–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90011-X

Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5

Tinbergen, N. (1954). Curious naturalist. New York: Basic Books.

Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ursu, S., Stenger, V., Shear, M., Jones, M., & Carter, C. S. (2003). Overactive action monitoring in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychological Science, 14, 347–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.24411

Van Essen, D. C., Feleman, D. J., DeYoe, E. A., Ollavaria, J., & Knierman, J. (1990). Modular and hierarchical organization of extrastriate visual cortex in the macaque monkey. Cold Springs Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 55, 679–696.

Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport, 15, 893–897.

Vecera, S., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Spatial attention does not require preattentive grouping. Neuropsychology, 11, 30–43. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&uid=1997-08159-003

Waldman, P. (2000, May 12, Friday). Master stroke: A tragedy transforms a right-handed artist into a lefty and a star. Wall Street Journal.

Waxman, S., & Geschwind, N. (1975). The interictal behavior syndrome associated with temporal lobe epilepsy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 1580–1586.

Wiesmann, M., & Ishai, A. (2008). Recollection- and familiaritybased decisions reflect memory strength. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.001.2008

Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 177–179.

Winston, J., OʼDoherty, J., Kilner, J., Perrett, D., & Dolan, R. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45, 195–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009

Woods, W. A. (1991). Parameters of aesthetic objects: Applied aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 105–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/7D3X-03G1-AGUV-W417

Wyvell, C., & Berridge, K. (2000). Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: Enhancement of reward “wanting” without enhanced “liking” or response reinforcement. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8122–8130.

Yago, E., & Ishai, A. (2006). Recognition memory is modulated by visual similarity. Neuroimage, 31, 807–817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.014

Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwinʼs puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zaidel, D. (2005). Neuropsychology of art. New York: Psychology Press.

Zaimov, K., Kitov, D., & Kolev, N. (1969). Aphasie chez un peintre. Encephale, 58, 377–417.

Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Zeki, S. (1999a). Art and the brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 76–96.

Zeki, S. (1999b). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

Links

Full Text

http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jocn.2010.21457

internal file


Sonstige Links

Abgerufen von „http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Neuroaesthetics:_a_coming_of_age_story&oldid=33004“