On Symmetry, Aesthetics and Quantifying Symmetrical Complexity: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „== Referenz == Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie, Anna Ursyn, Robert Zimmer, Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid: On Symmetry, Aesthetics and Quantifying Sym…“) |
|||
| Zeile 35: | Zeile 35: | ||
3. al-Rifaie, M.M., Leymarie, F.F., Latham, W., Bishop, M.: Swarmic autopoiesis and computational creativity. Connection Sci., 1–19 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1274960 | 3. al-Rifaie, M.M., Leymarie, F.F., Latham, W., Bishop, M.: Swarmic autopoiesis and computational creativity. Connection Sci., 1–19 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1274960 | ||
| − | 4. Bauerly, M., Liu, Y.: Computational modeling and experimental investigation of effects of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 64(8), 670–682 (2006) | + | 4. Bauerly, M., Liu, Y.: Computational modeling and experimental investigation of effects of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 64(8), 670–682 (2006) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Computational%20modeling%20and%20experimental%20investigation%20of%20effects%20of%20compositional%20elements%20on%20interface%20and%20design%20aesthetics&author=M.%20Bauerly&author=Y.%20Liu&journal=Int.%20J.%20Man%20Mach.%20Stud.&volume=64&issue=8&pages=670-682&publication_year=2006 |
| − | 5. Behrens, R.: Design in the Visual Arts. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1984) | + | 5. Behrens, R.: Design in the Visual Arts. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1984) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Design%20in%20the%20Visual%20Arts&author=R.%20Behrens&publication_year=1984 |
| − | 6. Bennett, C., Ryall, J., Spalteholz, L., Gooch, A.: The aesthetics of graph visualization. Comput. Aesthetics 2007, 57–64 (2007) | + | 6. Bennett, C., Ryall, J., Spalteholz, L., Gooch, A.: The aesthetics of graph visualization. Comput. Aesthetics 2007, 57–64 (2007) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20aesthetics%20of%20graph%20visualization&author=C.%20Bennett&author=J.%20Ryall&author=L.%20Spalteholz&author=A.%20Gooch&journal=Comput.%20Aesthetics&volume=2007&pages=57-64&publication_year=2007 |
| − | 7. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933) | + | 7. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933) https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734470 http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?59.0871.02 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Aesthetic%20Measure&author=GD.%20Birkhoff&publication_year=1933 |
| − | 8. Carroll, J.M. (ed.): HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003) | + | 8. Carroll, J.M. (ed.): HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=HCI%20Models%2C%20Theories%2C%20and%20Frameworks%20Toward%20a%20Multidisciplinary%20Science&publication_year=2003 |
| − | 9. Cheetham, M.A.: The crystal interface in contemporary art: metaphors of the organic and inorganic. Leonardo 43(3), 250–255 (2010) | + | 9. Cheetham, M.A.: The crystal interface in contemporary art: metaphors of the organic and inorganic. Leonardo 43(3), 250–255 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2010.43.3.250 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20crystal%20interface%20in%20contemporary%20art%3A%20metaphors%20of%20the%20organic%20and%20inorganic&author=MA.%20Cheetham&journal=Leonardo&volume=43&issue=3&pages=250-255&publication_year=2010 |
| − | 10. Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. Norton & Company, Inc., New York (1986) | + | 10. Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. Norton & Company, Inc., New York (1986) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20Blind%20Watchmaker&author=R.%20Dawkins&publication_year=1986 |
| − | 11. Ferreira, M.I.A.: Interactive bodies: The semiosis of architectural forms. Biosemiotics 5(2), 269–289 (2012) | + | 11. Ferreira, M.I.A.: Interactive bodies: The semiosis of architectural forms. Biosemiotics 5(2), 269–289 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9126-0 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Interactive%20bodies%3A%20The%20semiosis%20of%20architectural%20forms&author=MIA.%20Ferreira&journal=%20Biosemiotics&volume=5&issue=2&pages=269-289&publication_year=2012 |
| − | 12. Galanter, P.: Complexity, neuroaesthetics, and computational aesthetic evaluation. In: 13th International Conference on Generative Art (GA2010) (2010) | + | 12. Galanter, P.: Complexity, neuroaesthetics, and computational aesthetic evaluation. In: 13th International Conference on Generative Art (GA2010) (2010) https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Galanter%2C%20P.%3A%20Complexity%2C%20neuroaesthetics%2C%20and%20computational%20aesthetic%20evaluation.%20In%3A%2013th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Generative%20Art%20%28GA2010%29%20%282010%29 |
| − | 13. Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds.) Computers and Creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) | + | 13. Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds.) Computers and Creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_10 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Computational%20aesthetic%20evaluation%3A%20past%20and%20future&author=P.%20Galanter&pages=255-293&publication_year=2012 |
| − | 14. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., Yeo, R.A.: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15(2), 73–85 (1994) | + | 14. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., Yeo, R.A.: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15(2), 73–85 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Facial%20attractiveness%2C%20developmental%20stability%2C%20and%20fluctuating%20asymmetry&author=SW.%20Gangestad&author=R.%20Thornhill&author=RA.%20Yeo&journal=Ethol.%20Sociobiol.&volume=15&issue=2&pages=73-85&publication_year=1994 |
| − | 15. Gaviria, A.R.: When is information visualization art? determining the critical criteria. Leonardo 41(5), 479–482 (2008) | + | 15. Gaviria, A.R.: When is information visualization art? determining the critical criteria. Leonardo 41(5), 479–482 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2008.41.5.479 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=When%20is%20information%20visualization%20art%3F%20determining%20the%20critical%20criteria&author=AR.%20Gaviria&journal=Leonardo&volume=41&issue=5&pages=479-482&publication_year=2008 |
| − | 16. Jacobsen, T., Hofel, L.: Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Percept. Mot. Skills 95(3), 755–766 (2002) | + | 16. Jacobsen, T., Hofel, L.: Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Percept. Mot. Skills 95(3), 755–766 (2002) https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.755 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Aesthetic%20judgments%20of%20novel%20graphic%20patterns%3A%20analyses%20of%20individual%20judgments&author=T.%20Jacobsen&author=L.%20Hofel&journal=Percept.%20Mot.%20Skills&volume=95&issue=3&pages=755-766&publication_year=2002 |
| − | 17. Javid, M.A.J., Blackwell, T., Zimmer, R., al-Rifaie, M.M.: Correlation between human aesthetic judgement and spatial complexity measure. In: Johnson, C., Ciesielski, V., Correia, J., Machado, P. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2016. LNCS, vol. 9596, pp. 79–91. Springer, Cham (2016). doi | + | 17. Javid, M.A.J., Blackwell, T., Zimmer, R., al-Rifaie, M.M.: Correlation between human aesthetic judgement and spatial complexity measure. In: Johnson, C., Ciesielski, V., Correia, J., Machado, P. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2016. LNCS, vol. 9596, pp. 79–91. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31008-4_6 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Correlation%20between%20human%20aesthetic%20judgement%20and%20spatial%20complexity%20measure&author=MAJ.%20Javid&author=T.%20Blackwell&author=R.%20Zimmer&author=MM.%20al-Rifaie&pages=79-91&publication_year=2016 |
| − | 18. Jiang, H., Ngo, C.W., Tan, H.K.: Gestalt-based feature similarity measure in trademark database. Pattern Recogn. 39(5), 988–1001 (2006) | + | 18. Jiang, H., Ngo, C.W., Tan, H.K.: Gestalt-based feature similarity measure in trademark database. Pattern Recogn. 39(5), 988–1001 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2005.08.012 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Gestalt-based%20feature%20similarity%20measure%20in%20trademark%20database&author=H.%20Jiang&author=CW.%20Ngo&author=HK.%20Tan&journal=Pattern%20Recogn.&volume=39&issue=5&pages=988-1001&publication_year=2006 |
19. Kettle, S.F.: Symmetry and Structure: Readable Group Theory for Chemists. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar | 19. Kettle, S.F.: Symmetry and Structure: Readable Group Theory for Chemists. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar | ||
Version vom 3. Dezember 2017, 21:45 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Referenz
Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie, Anna Ursyn, Robert Zimmer, Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid: On Symmetry, Aesthetics and Quantifying Symmetrical Complexity. In: EvoMUSART 2017, 17-32
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55750-2_2
Abstract
The concepts of order and complexity and their quantitative evaluation have been at the core of computational notion of aesthetics. One of the major challenges is conforming human intuitive perception and what we perceive as aesthetically pleasing with the output of a computational model. Informational theories of aesthetics have taken advantage of entropy in measuring order and complexity of stimuli in relation to their aesthetic value. However entropy fails to discriminate structurally different patterns in a 2D plane. In this work, following an overview on symmetry and its significance in the domain of aesthetics, a nature-inspired, swarm intelligence technique (Dispersive Flies Optimisation or DFO) is introduced and then adapted to detect symmetries and quantify symmetrical complexities in images. The 252 Jacobsen & Höfel’s images used in this paper are created by researchers in the psychology and visual domain as part of an experimental study on human aesthetic perception. Some of the images are symmetrical and some are asymmetrical, all varying in terms of their aesthetics, which are ranked by humans. The results of the presented nature-inspired algorithm is then compared to what humans in the study aesthetically appreciated and ranked. Whilst the authors believe there is still a long way to have a strong correlation between a computational model of complexity and human appreciation, the results of the comparison are promising.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@incollection{
year={2017},
isbn={978-3-319-55750-2},
booktitle={Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design},
volume={10198},
series={Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
editor={Correia, João and Ciesielski, Vic and Liapis, Antonios},
doi={10.1007/978-3-319-55750-2_2},
title={On Symmetry, Aesthetics and Quantifying Symmetrical Complexity},
url={https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-55750-2_2 http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=On_Symmetry,_Aesthetics_and_Quantifying_Symmetrical_Complexity},
publisher={Springer International Publishing},
keywords={Human aesthetic perception; Symmetry and complexity; Aesthetics; Swarm intelligence; Dispersive flies optimisation},
author={al-Rifaie, Mohammad Majid and Ursyn, Anna and Zimmer, Robert and Javid, Mohammad Ali Javaheri},
pages={17-32},
language={English}
}
Used References
1. al-Rifaie, M.M.: Dispersive flies optimisation. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.): Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 529–538. IEEE (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2014F142
2. al-Rifaie, M.M., Aber, A.: Dispersive flies optimisation and medical imaging. In: Fidanova, S. (ed.) Recent Advances in Computational Optimization. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 610, pp. 183–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21133-6_11 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Dispersive%20flies%20optimisation%20and%20medical%20imaging&author=MM.%20al-Rifaie&author=A.%20Aber&pages=183-203&publication_year=2016
3. al-Rifaie, M.M., Leymarie, F.F., Latham, W., Bishop, M.: Swarmic autopoiesis and computational creativity. Connection Sci., 1–19 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1274960
4. Bauerly, M., Liu, Y.: Computational modeling and experimental investigation of effects of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 64(8), 670–682 (2006) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Computational%20modeling%20and%20experimental%20investigation%20of%20effects%20of%20compositional%20elements%20on%20interface%20and%20design%20aesthetics&author=M.%20Bauerly&author=Y.%20Liu&journal=Int.%20J.%20Man%20Mach.%20Stud.&volume=64&issue=8&pages=670-682&publication_year=2006
5. Behrens, R.: Design in the Visual Arts. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1984) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Design%20in%20the%20Visual%20Arts&author=R.%20Behrens&publication_year=1984
6. Bennett, C., Ryall, J., Spalteholz, L., Gooch, A.: The aesthetics of graph visualization. Comput. Aesthetics 2007, 57–64 (2007) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20aesthetics%20of%20graph%20visualization&author=C.%20Bennett&author=J.%20Ryall&author=L.%20Spalteholz&author=A.%20Gooch&journal=Comput.%20Aesthetics&volume=2007&pages=57-64&publication_year=2007
7. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933) https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734470 http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?59.0871.02 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Aesthetic%20Measure&author=GD.%20Birkhoff&publication_year=1933
8. Carroll, J.M. (ed.): HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=HCI%20Models%2C%20Theories%2C%20and%20Frameworks%20Toward%20a%20Multidisciplinary%20Science&publication_year=2003
9. Cheetham, M.A.: The crystal interface in contemporary art: metaphors of the organic and inorganic. Leonardo 43(3), 250–255 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2010.43.3.250 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20crystal%20interface%20in%20contemporary%20art%3A%20metaphors%20of%20the%20organic%20and%20inorganic&author=MA.%20Cheetham&journal=Leonardo&volume=43&issue=3&pages=250-255&publication_year=2010
10. Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. Norton & Company, Inc., New York (1986) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20Blind%20Watchmaker&author=R.%20Dawkins&publication_year=1986
11. Ferreira, M.I.A.: Interactive bodies: The semiosis of architectural forms. Biosemiotics 5(2), 269–289 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9126-0 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Interactive%20bodies%3A%20The%20semiosis%20of%20architectural%20forms&author=MIA.%20Ferreira&journal=%20Biosemiotics&volume=5&issue=2&pages=269-289&publication_year=2012
12. Galanter, P.: Complexity, neuroaesthetics, and computational aesthetic evaluation. In: 13th International Conference on Generative Art (GA2010) (2010) https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Galanter%2C%20P.%3A%20Complexity%2C%20neuroaesthetics%2C%20and%20computational%20aesthetic%20evaluation.%20In%3A%2013th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Generative%20Art%20%28GA2010%29%20%282010%29
13. Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds.) Computers and Creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_10 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Computational%20aesthetic%20evaluation%3A%20past%20and%20future&author=P.%20Galanter&pages=255-293&publication_year=2012
14. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., Yeo, R.A.: Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15(2), 73–85 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Facial%20attractiveness%2C%20developmental%20stability%2C%20and%20fluctuating%20asymmetry&author=SW.%20Gangestad&author=R.%20Thornhill&author=RA.%20Yeo&journal=Ethol.%20Sociobiol.&volume=15&issue=2&pages=73-85&publication_year=1994
15. Gaviria, A.R.: When is information visualization art? determining the critical criteria. Leonardo 41(5), 479–482 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2008.41.5.479 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=When%20is%20information%20visualization%20art%3F%20determining%20the%20critical%20criteria&author=AR.%20Gaviria&journal=Leonardo&volume=41&issue=5&pages=479-482&publication_year=2008
16. Jacobsen, T., Hofel, L.: Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Percept. Mot. Skills 95(3), 755–766 (2002) https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.755 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Aesthetic%20judgments%20of%20novel%20graphic%20patterns%3A%20analyses%20of%20individual%20judgments&author=T.%20Jacobsen&author=L.%20Hofel&journal=Percept.%20Mot.%20Skills&volume=95&issue=3&pages=755-766&publication_year=2002
17. Javid, M.A.J., Blackwell, T., Zimmer, R., al-Rifaie, M.M.: Correlation between human aesthetic judgement and spatial complexity measure. In: Johnson, C., Ciesielski, V., Correia, J., Machado, P. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2016. LNCS, vol. 9596, pp. 79–91. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31008-4_6 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Correlation%20between%20human%20aesthetic%20judgement%20and%20spatial%20complexity%20measure&author=MAJ.%20Javid&author=T.%20Blackwell&author=R.%20Zimmer&author=MM.%20al-Rifaie&pages=79-91&publication_year=2016
18. Jiang, H., Ngo, C.W., Tan, H.K.: Gestalt-based feature similarity measure in trademark database. Pattern Recogn. 39(5), 988–1001 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2005.08.012 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Gestalt-based%20feature%20similarity%20measure%20in%20trademark%20database&author=H.%20Jiang&author=CW.%20Ngo&author=HK.%20Tan&journal=Pattern%20Recogn.&volume=39&issue=5&pages=988-1001&publication_year=2006
19. Kettle, S.F.: Symmetry and Structure: Readable Group Theory for Chemists. Wiley, New York (2008)Google Scholar
20. Lau, A., Moere, A.V.: Towards a model of information aesthetics in information visualization. In: 2007 11th International Conference on Information Visualization, IV 2007, pp. 87–92. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
21. Lévi-Strauss, C.: Look, Listen, Learn. Translated by Singer, B.C.J.: Basic Books, a division of Harper-Collins Publishers (1997). ISBN 0465068804Google Scholar
22. Lewis, M.: Evolutionary visual art and design. In: Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.) The Art of Artificial Evolution. Natural Computing Series, pp. 3–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Leyton, M.: Symmetry, Causality, Mind. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
24. Liu, Y.: Computational Symmetry. CMU Robotics Institute (2000)Google Scholar
25. McCormack, J.: Interactive evolution of L-system grammars for computer graphics modelling. In: Complex Systems: From Biology to Computation, pp. 118–130 (1993)Google Scholar
26. Møller, A.P., Cuervo, J.J.: Asymmetry, size and sexual selection: meta-analysis, publication bias and factors affecting variation in relationships, p. 1. Oxford University Press (1999)Google Scholar
27. Møller, A.P., Thornhill, R.: Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection a meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151(2), 174–192 (1998)Google Scholar
28. Onians, J.: Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. Yale University Press, New Haven (2007)Google Scholar
29. Park, I.K., Lee, K.M., Lee, S.U.: Perceptual grouping of line features in 3-D space: A model-based framework. Pattern Recogn. 37(1), 145–159 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
30. Purchase, H.C.: Metrics for graph drawing aesthetics. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 13(5), 501–516 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Purchase, H.C., Plimmer, B., Baker, R., Pilcher, C.: Graph drawing aesthetics in user-sketched graph layouts. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on User Interface, vol. 106, pp. 80–88. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2010)Google Scholar
32. Railton, P.: Aesthetic value, moral value and the ambitions of naturalism. In: Aesthetics and Ethics, chap. 3. University of Maryland (2001)Google Scholar
33. Randy, T., Steven, G.: Human facial beauty. Hum. Nat. 4, 237–269 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Rankin, D.W., Mitzel, N., Morrison, C.: Structural Methods in Molecular Inorganic Chemistry. Wiley, New York (2013)Google Scholar
35. Senyuk, B., Liu, Q., He, S., Kamien, R.D., Kusner, R.B., Lubensky, T.C., Smalyukh, I.I.: Topological colloids. Nature 493(7431), 200–205 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Shackelford, T.K., Larsen, R.J.: Facial symmetry as an indicator of psychological emotional and physiological distress. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72(2), 456–466 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Sims, K.: Evolving virtual creatures. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 15–22. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
38. Stanley, W.: Crystalline tobacco-mosaic virus protein. Am. J. Bot. 24(2), 59–68 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Todd, S., Latham, W., Hughes, P.: Computer sculpture design and animation. J. Visual. Comput. Anim. 2(3), 98–105 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Ware, C., Purchase, H., Colpoys, L., McGill, M.: Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Inf. Visual. 1(2), 103–110 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Zeki, S., Nash, J.: Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain, vol. 415. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
Links
Full Text
