The FloWr Framework: Automated Flowchart Construction, Optimisation and Alteration for Creative Systems
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
John Charnley, Simon Colton and Maria Teresa Llano: The FloWr Framework: Automated Flowchart Construction, Optimisation and Alteration for Creative Systems. In: Computational Creativity 2014 ICCC 2014.
DOI
Abstract
We describe the FloWr framework for implementing creative systems as scripts over processes and manipulated visually as flowcharts. FloWr has been specifically developed to be able to automatically optimise, alter and ultimately generate novel flowcharts, thus innovating at process level. We describe the fundamental architecture of the framework and provide ex- amples of creative systems which have been implemented in FloWr. Via some preliminary experimentation, we demon- strate how FloWr can optimise a given system for efficiency and yield, alter input parameters to increase unexpectedness, and build novel generative systems automatically.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
Carlisle, M.; Wilson, T.; Humphries, J.; and Hadfield, S. 2004. RAPTOR: Introducing programming to non-majors with flowcharts. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 19(4).
Colton, S.; Goodwin, J.; and Veale, T. 2012. Full-FACE po- etry generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity.
Colton, S. 2002. Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathemat- ics. Springer.
Colton, S. 2012. The Painting Fool: Stories from building an automated painter. In McCormack, J., and d’Inverno, M., eds., Computers and Creativity. Springer.
Colton, S. 2014. The HR3 discovery system. In Proceedings of the AISB symposium on computational scientific discovery.
Colton, S. and Ventura, D. 2014. You Can’t Know my Mind: A Festival of Computational Creativity. In Late Breaking Proceed- ings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity.
Cook, M.; Colton, S.; Raad, A.; and Gow, J. 2013. Mechanic miner: Reflection-driven game mechanic discovery and level de- sign. In Proceedings of the EvoGames workshop.
Cox, T. (Presenter) Can a Computer Write Shakespeare? BBC Radio 4 documentary, first aired on 15th May 2014.
Gomes, P.; Pereira, F.; Paiva, P.; Seco, N.; Carreiro, P.; Ferreira, J.; and Bento, C. 2005. Rebuilder: a case-based reasoning approach to knowledge management in software design. Engineering Intelli- gent Systems for Electrical Engineering & Communications 13(4).
Kilgarriff, A. 1997. Putting frequencies in the dictionary. Interna- tional Journal of Lexicography 10(2).
Leech, G.; Garside, R.; and Bryant, M. 1994. CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th COLING.
Liu, H., and Singh, P. 2004. Commonsense reasoning in and over natural language. In Proceedings of the 8th International Confer- ence on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineer- ing.
Llano, M. T.; Hepworth, R.; Colton, S.; Charnley, J.; and Gow, J. 2014. Automating fictional ideation using ConceptNet. In Pro- ceedings of the AISB Symposium on Computational Creativity.
Llano, M. T.; Hepworth, R.; Colton, S.; Gow, J.; Charnley, J.; Lavraˇc, N.; Znidarˇsiˇc, M.; Perovˇsek, M.; Granroth-Wilding, M.; and Clark, S. 2014. Baseline Methods for Automated Fictional Ideation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Com- putational Creativity.
Mihalcea, R., and Tarau, P. 2004. Textrank: Bringing order into texts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Muggleton, S. 1991. Inductive Logic Programming. New Genera- tion Computing 8(4).
Porter, M. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3). Romero, J., and Machado, P. 2007. The Art of Artificial Evolution. Springer.
Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I.; and Booch, G. 2004. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Pearson Higher Education.
Links
Full Text
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/06//14.4_Charnley.pdf
