Is Biologically Inspired Invention Different?: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(→Used References) |
(→Used References) |
||
| Zeile 110: | Zeile 110: | ||
Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45- | Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45- | ||
56. | 56. | ||
| + | |||
Gick M, and Holyoak KJ (1983). Schema induction and | Gick M, and Holyoak KJ (1983). Schema induction and | ||
analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15:1-38. | analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15:1-38. | ||
Version vom 29. Oktober 2015, 14:02 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Ashok K. Goel: Is Biologically Inspired Invention Different?. In: Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015, 47-54.
DOI
Abstract
The paradigm of biologically inspired design views nature as a vast library of robust, efficient and multifunctional designs, and espouses the use nature as a source of analogues for inspiring novel designs in domains of interest such as architecture, computing, engineering, etc. Over the last generation, biologically inspired design has emerged as a major movement in engineering, architectural, and systems design, pulled in part by the need for environmentally sustainable design and pushed partly by the desire for creativity and innovation in design. An important question is whether biologically inspired design is fundamentally different from other kinds of analogybased creative processes. This question is critical because the computational theories, techniques and tools we need to develop to support biologically inspired design depend on the nature of the task itself. In this paper, we first summarize some of our empirical findings about biologically inspired design, then derive a task model for it, and finally posit that biologically inspired design indeed is a novel methodology for multiple reasons.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{
author = {Goel, Ashok K.},
title = {Is Biologically Inspired Invention Different?},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2015},
year = {2015},
month = {Jun},
location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
pages = {47-54},
url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/3_1Goel.pdf},
url = {http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Is_Biologically_Inspired_Invention_Different},
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}
Used References
Altshuller, G. (1984). Creativity as an exact science. Gordon and Branch Publishers, Luxembourg.
Baumeister, D., Tocke, R., Dwyer, J., Ritter, S., & Benyus, J. (2012) Biomimicry Resource Handbook. Biomimicry 3.8, Missoula, MT, USA.
Benyus, J. (1997) Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: William Morrow.
Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1994) Model-Based Discovery of Physical Principles from Design Experiences. AIEDAM 8(2):113-123.
Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1996) From Design Cases to Generic Mechanisms. AIEDAM 10:131-136.
Bonser, R., & Vincent, J.. (2007). Technology trajectories, innovation, and the growth of biomimetics. In Procs. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 221(10), 1177–1180.
Brown, D., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989) Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
Chandrasekaran, B. (1990) Design problem solving: a task analysis. AI Magazine 11(4):59-71.
Crandall, B., Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. MIT Press.
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22, pp. 425-437.
Dunbar K. (2001) The Analogical Paradox. In Gentner, D, Holyoak, K.J., & Kokinov, B.N. (Eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. MIT Press. Boston.
Dym, C., & Brown, D. (2012) Engineering design: Representations and Reasoning. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K., Gentner, D. (1989) The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1): 1-63.
Fish, F., Weber, P., Murray, M., & Howles, L. (2011) The Tubercles of Humpback Whale Fillers: Application of Bioinspired Technology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 51(1): 203-213.
French, M. (1994) Invention and evolution: design in nature and engineering. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
French M. (1996). Conceptual design for engineers. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag. London.
Gentner, D. (1983) Structure Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2): 155-170.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. (1997) Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity. American Psychologist 52(1): 45- 56.
Gick M, and Holyoak KJ (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15:1-38. Gleich, A. von, Pade, C., Petschow, U., & Pissarskoi, E. (2010). Potentials and Trends in Biomimetics. Berlin: Springer.
Goel, A. (2013) Biologically Inspired Design: A New Program for AI Research on Computational Sustainability. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(3): 80-84.
Goel, A., & Bhatta, S. (2004) Use of Design Patterns in Analogy-Based Design. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2):85-94, 2004.
Goel, A., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1992) Case-Based Design: A Task Analysis. In Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Engineering Design, Volume II: Innovative Design, C. Tong and D. Sriram (editors), pp. 165-184, San Diego: Academic Press, 1992.
Goel, A., McAdams, D., & Stone, R. (editors, 2014) Biologically Inspired Design: Computational Methods and Tools, London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
Goel, A., Zhang, G., Wiltgen, B., Zhang, Y., Vattam, S., & Yen, J. (2015) On the Benefits of Digital Libraries of Case Studies of Analogical Design: Documentation, Access, Analysis and Learning. AIEDAM 29(2):215-227.
Helms, M., Vattam, S., & Goel, A. (2009) Biologically Inspired Design: Process and Products, Design Studies, 30(5):606-622.
Helms, M., & Goel, A. (2012), Analogical Problem Evolution in Biologically Inspired Design. In Procs. 5th International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, College Station, Texas. Berlin:Springer.
Hofstadter, D., (editor, 1996) Fluid Concepts & Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Holyoak, K., & Thagard, P. (1996) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. MIT Press.
Indurkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and cognition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Keane M (1988) Analogical Problem Solving. Ellis Horwood. Chichester
Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kauffman.
Lepora, N., Verschure, P., & Prescott, T. (2013) The state of the art in biomimetics. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 8(1).
Maher, M.L., & Tang, H. (2003) Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1):47-64.
Nagel, J. (2014) A Thesaurus for Bioinspired Engineering Design. In Biologically Inspired Design: Computational Methods and Tools, Goel, McAdams & Stone (editors), Springer.
Simon, H. (1996) Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd Edition. MIT Press.
The Biomimicry Institute (2011). http://biomimicry.org/ Last retrieved on April 28, 2011.
Turner, J. (2007). The Tinkerer’s Accomplice: How Design Emerges from Life Itself. Harvard University Press.
Vattam, S., & Goel, A. (2013) Biological Solutions for Engineering Problems: Cross-Domain Textual Case-Based Reasoning in Biologically Inspired Design. In Procs. 21st International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, July 2013, pp. 343-357.
Vattam, S., Helms, M., Goel, A. (2007) Biologically Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: A Cognitive Study. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-07, Graphics, Visualization & Usability Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Vattam, S., Helms, M., & Goel, A. (2008) Compound Analogical Design: Interaction Between Problem Decomposition and Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design. In Proc. Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, Atlanta, June 2008.
Vattam, S., Helms, M., & Goel, A. (2010) A Content Account of Creative Analogies in Biologically Inspired Design. AIEDAM 24: 467-481.
Veale, T. (2003) The Analogical Thesaurus. In Procs. 15th Innovative Applications of AI Conference (IAAI-2003), pp. 137-142.
Vincent J., Bogatyreva O., Bogatyrev N., Bowyer A, Pahl A. (2006) Biomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3, 471–482.
Vincent, J., & Mann, D. (2002) Systematic Transfer from Biology to Engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 360: 159-173.
Vogel, S (2000) Cat’s Paws and Catapults: Mechanical Worlds of Nature and People. W.W. Norton and Company.
Weiler, C., & Goel, A. (2015) From Mitochondria to Water Harvesting: A Case Study in Biologically Inspired Design. IEEE Potentials, 34(2): 38-43.
Yen, J., Weissburg, M., Helms, M., & Goel, A. (2011) Biologically inspired design: a tool for interdisciplinary education. In Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation, Y. Bar-Cohen (editor), Taylor & Francis.
Yen, J., Helms, M., Tovey, C., Weissburg, M., & Goel, A. (2014) Adaptive Evolution of a Biologically Inspired Design Course. In Biologically Inspired Design: Computational Methods and Tools, Goel, McAdams & Stone (editors), pp. 153-200, London: Springer.
Links
Full Text
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/3_1Goel.pdf
