Casual Creators

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Reference

Kate Compton and Michael Mateas: Casual Creators. In: Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015, 228-235.

DOI

Abstract

Many creativity tools exist to support task-focused creativity, but in recent years we have seen a flourishing of autotelic creativity tools, which privilege the enjoyable experience of explorative creativity over taskcompletion. Because these tools are much smaller in scope, less commercially significant, and less ”serious” than their larger siblings, they have been overlooked in academic research. This paper coins the term ”Casual Creators” for these tools, and provide a definition to identify tools that belong to this category. We also identify the particular design considerations that arise from autotelic creativity, and propose a number of strong design patterns that serve those considerations, patterns which are demonstrated by case studies of software built with those patterns. We believe that once this field is identified and named, the currently-isolated practitioners who make these casual creators will be able to share knowledge, like these design patterns, and develop a community of practice.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Compton, Kate and Mateas, Michael},
 title = {Casual Creators},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2015},
 year = {2015},
 month = {Jun},
 location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
 pages = {228-235},
 url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/10_2Compton.pdf },
 url = {http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Casual_Creators },
 publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
 keywords = {computational, creativity},
}

Used References

Amabile, T. M.; Goldfarb, P.; and Brackfleld, S. C. 1990. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity research journal 3(1):6–21.

Bayles, D.; Orland, T.; and Morey, A. 2012. Art & fear. Tantor Media, Incorporated.

Boden, M. A. 2009. Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine 30(3):23.

Colton, S.; L´opez de Mantaras, R.; Stock, O.; et al. 2009. Computational creativity: Coming of age. AI Magazine 30(3):11–14.

Colton, S. 2012. The painting fool: Stories from building an automated painter. In Computers and creativity. Springer. 3–38.

Compton, K.; Osborn, J. C.; and Mateas, M. 2013. Generative methods. In The Fourth Procedural Content Generation in Games workshop, PCG.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2000. Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.

Davis, N.; Popova, Y.; Sysoev, I.; Hsiao, C.-P.; Zhang, D.; and Magerko, B. 2014. Building artistic computer colleagues with an enactive model of creativity. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.

Gero, J. S. 1994. Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design. In Formal design methods for CAD, 315–336.

Gingold, C. 2003. Miniature gardens & magic crayons: Games, spaces, & worlds. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Hecker, C.; Raabe, B.; Enslow, R. W.; DeWeese, J.; Maynard, J.; and van Prooijen, K. 2008. Real-time motion retargeting to highly varied user-created morphologies. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), volume 27, 27. ACM.

Kaufman, J. C., and Beghetto, R. A. 2009. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology 13(1):1.

Klau, G. W.; Lesh, N.; Marks, J.; and Mitzenmacher, M. 2010. Human-guided search. Journal of Heuristics 16(3):289–310.

Klimas, C. 2012. Twine. Accessed: 2015-02-24.

Lubart, T. 2005. How can computers be partners in the creative process: classification and commentary on the special issue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63(4):365–369.

Maher, M. L. 2012. Computational and collective creativity: who’s being creative? In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Creativity, 67–71.

Nilsson, B. 2003. ‘i can always make another one!’–young musicians creating music with digital tools. Musicianship in the 21st century: issues, trends and possibilities (Sydney, Australian Music Centre).

Petrovic, S., and Matthews, D. 2013. Unsupervised joke generation from big data. In ACL (2), 228–232.

Resnick, M.; Myers, B.; Nakakoji, K.; Shneiderman, B.; Pausch, R.; Selker, T.; and Eisenberg, M. 2005. Design principles for tools to support creative thinking.

Resnick, M.; Maloney, J.; Monroy-Hern´andez, A.; Rusk, N.; Eastmond, E.; Brennan, K.; Millner, A.; Rosenbaum, E.; Silver, J.; Silverman, B.; et al. 2009. Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM 52(11):60–67.

Riedl, M. O., and ONeill, B. 2009. Computer as audience: A strategy for artificial intelligence support of human creativity. In Proc. CHI Workshop of Computational Creativity Support.

Schon, D. A. 1992. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design 3(3):131–147.

Secretan, J.; Beato, N.; D’Ambrosio, D. B.; Rodriguez, A.; Campbell, A.; Folsom-Kovarik, J. T.; and Stanley, K. O. 2011. Picbreeder: A case study in collaborative evolutionary exploration of design space. Evolutionary Computation 19(3):373–403.

Shneiderman, B. 1993. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. Sparks of innovation in humancomputer interaction 17:1993.

Shneiderman, B. 2003. Leonardo’s laptop: human needs and the new computing technologies. Mit Press. System, N. 2015. Nervous system.

Talton, J.; Gibson, D.; Hanrahan, P.; and Koltun, V. 2008. Collaborative mapping of a parametric design space. Technical report, Citeseer.

Yannakakis, G. N.; Liapis, A.; and Alexopoulos, C. 2014. Mixed-initiative cocreativity. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games.


Links

Full Text

http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/10_2Compton.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links