A Model of Runaway Evolution of Creative Domains
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Oliver Bown: A Model of Runaway Evolution of Creative Domains. In: Computational Creativity 2014 ICCC 2014, 247-253.
DOI
Abstract
Creative domains such as art and music have distinct properties, not only in terms of the structure of the arte- facts produced by in terms of their cultural dynamics and relation to adaptive functions. A number of theo- ries have examined the possibility of functionless cul- tural domains emerging through a runaway evolution- ary process. This includes models in which engaging in creative domains is actually counterproductive at the in- dividual level, but is sustained as a behaviour through an evolutionary mechanism. I present a multi-agent model that examines such an evolutionary mechanism, derived from these theories.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{
author = {Oliver Bown},
title = {A Model of Runaway Evolution of Creative Domains},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2014},
year = {2014},
month = {Jun},
location = {Ljubljana, Slovenia},
pages = {247-253},
url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/06//12.1_Bown.pdf, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=A_Model_of_Runaway_Evolution_of_Creative_Domains },
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}
Used References
Blackmore, S. J. 1999. The Meme Machine. New York: OUP.
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolu- tionary Process. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, S. 2007. Contagious heterophony: A new theory about the origins of music. MusicæScientiæ 11(1):3–26.
Conte, R.; Gilbert, N.; Bonelli, G.; Cioffi-Revilla, C.; Def- fuant, G.; Kertesz, J.; Loreto, V.; Moat, S.; Nadal, J.-P.; Sanchez, A.; et al. 2012. Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214(1):325–346.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. The domain of creativity. In Runco, M., and Albert, R. S., eds., Theories of Creativity. Sage Publications. 190—212.
Darwin, C. 1883. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York, USA: Appleton and Co.
Di Paolo, E.; Noble, J.; and Bullock, S. 2000. Simulation models as opaque thought experiments. In A.Bedau, M.; McCaskill, J. S.; Packard, N. H.; and Rasmussen, S., eds., Articial Life VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Articial Life, 497–506. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review 7:184–192.
Fisher, R. A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Sec- tion. London: Dover.
Hargreaves, D. J., and North, A. C. 1999. The functions of music in everyday life: Redefining the social in music psychology. Psychology of Music 27(1):71–83.
Huron, D. 2001. Is music an evolutionary adaptation? An- nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930(1):43–61. Huron, D. 2006. Sweet Anticipation. MIT Press.
Laland, K. N.; Odling-Smee, J.; and Feldman, M. W. 2000. Niche construction, biological evolution, and cul- tural change. Behavioral and brain sciences 23(01):131– 146. Maynard Smith, J., and Szathm ́ary, E. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. 2000. Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In Wallin, N. L.; Merker, B.; and Brown, S., eds., The Origins of Music. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. 329–360.
Miranda, E. R.; Kirby, S.; and Todd, P. M. 2003. On com- putational models of the evolution of music: From the origins of musical taste to the emergence of grammars. Contemporary Music Review 22(3):91–111.
Pinker, S. 1998. How the Mind Works. London, UK: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Salganik, M. J.; Dodds, P. S.; and Watts, D. J. 2006. Ex- perimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. science 311(5762):854–856.
Saunders, R., and Gero, J. S. 2001. Artificial creativity: Emergent notions of creativity in artificial societies of cu- rious agents. In Proceedings of the Second Iteration Con- ference.
Sosa, R., and Gero, J. S. 2003. Design and change: A model of situated creativity. In Bento, C.; Cardoso, A.; and Gero, J., eds., Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, IJCAI03, 25–34.
Wilson, D. 1994. Adaptive genetic variation and hu- man evolutionary psychology. Ethology and Sociobiology 15:219–235.
Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of theoretical Biology 53(1):205–214.
Links
Full Text
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/06//12.1_Bown.pdf
