A neuro-genetic hybrid motif generator for genetic art
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Wolfer, J. (2005). A neuro-genetic hybrid motif generator for genetic art. In: Computer Graphics and Imaging, 31–36.
DOI
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.83.9588
Abstract
There have been a variety of methods for producing evolutionary art using Genetic Programming and other genetic algorithms. While some have included an underlying image, many of these systems produce aesthetically pleasing abstract images without overt structure. By using a physiologically inspired pulse-coupled neural network to find salient regions in an underlying image, and by subsequently introducing a motif function into the genetic programming system, we are able to augment the paradigm to introduce thematic image regions.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
[1] Semir Zeki. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford Press, 2002.
[2] JoAnn Wypijewski. Painting by Numbers: Komar and Melamid’s Scientific Guide to Art. University of California Press, 1997.
3] Karl Sims. Artificial evolution for computer graphics. In Computer Graphics, pages 319–328, 1991.
[4] Mara Elizabeth Jones and Arvin Agah. Evolution of digital images. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics C, 32(3):261–271, August 2002.
[5] Steven Rooke. Eons of Genetically Evolved Algorith- mic Images in Creative Evolutionary Systems. Mor- gan Kaufmann, 2002.
[6] A. Wiens and B.J. Ross. Gentropy: Evolutionary 2d texture generation. Computers and Graphics Journal, 26(1):75–88, 2002.
[7] Nils Svangard and Peter Nordin. Automated aesthetic selection of evolutionary art by distance based classi- fication of genomes and phenomes using the univer- sal similarity metric. In Applications of Evolution- ary Computing, EvoWorkshops2004: EvoMUSART, pages 447–456. Springer Verlag, 5-7 April 2004.
[8] P. Machado and A. Cardoso. Nevar – the assessment of an evolutionary art tool. In AISB’00 Symoosium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Science, 2000.
[9] Yann Semet, Una-May O’Reilly, and Fredo Du- rand. An interactive artificial ant approach to non- photorealistic rendering. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2004, pages 188–200, 2004.
[10] E.R. Davies. Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithms, Practicalities. Academic Press, 1997.
[11] Marian M. Choy and Jesse S. Jin. Improving border identification in two-dimensional echocardiograms using temporal information. In IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pages 879–880, 1996.
[12] Reinhard Eckhorn. Neural mechanisms of scene seg- mentation: Recordings from the visual cortex suggest basic circuits for linking field models. IEEE Transac- tions on Neural Networks, 10(3):464–479, May 1999.
[13] Reinhard Eckhorn, Alexander M. Gail, Andread Bruns, Andreas Gabriel, Basim Al-Shaikhli, and Mirko Saam. Different types of signal coupling in the visual cortex related to neural mechanisms of associa- tive processing and perception. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15(5):1039–1052, September 2004.
[14] John L. Johnson. Pulse-coupled neural nets: trans- lation, rotation, scale, distortion, and intensity signal invariance for images. Applied Optics, 33(26):6239– 6253, September 1994.
[15] Thomas Lindblad and Jason M. Kinser. Image Processing using Pulse-Coupled Neural Networks. Springer Verlag, 1998.
[16] John L. Johnson and Mary Lou Padgett. Pcnn mod- els and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(3):480–496, May 1999.
Links
Full Text
https://www.iusb.edu/computerscience/people/jwolfer/gcim-478-034.pdf
