Aesthetic selection of developmental art forms
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Thomas, D.: Aesthetic selection of developmental art forms. In: Standish, R., et al. (eds.) Artificial Live VIII Conference Proceedings, pp. 157–163. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003).
DOI
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.3.3237
Abstract
Aesthetic selection has been employed in a system such that users can guide the evolution of art forms. The attributes of these forms are defined implicitly by an artificial genome, requiring a growth period to generate the final structure. During this growth phase, artificial chemicals react and di#use across the surface of the developing structure, causing growth and other structural changes. The forms are part of a small evolving population in which fitness of each individual is entirely defined by the user. Throughout evolution user can design objects interactively or simply to explore the range of possible forms of the system.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
Bongard, J. C., and Pfeifer, R. 2001. Repeated structure and dissociation of genotypic and phenotypic com- plexity in artificial ontogeny. In Proceedings of The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO-2001, 829–836. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Brooks, R., and Maes, P., eds. 1994. Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Fitzhugh, R. 1962. Impulse and physiological states in models of nerve membrane. Biophysics J. 1:445–466.
Hara, F., and Pfeifer, R. 2000. On the relation among morphology, material, and control in morpho- functonal machines. In From animals to animats 6. Proceedings of the 6th Int. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, 33–42. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Holland, J. 1992. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2nd edition.
Koza, J. R. 1992. Genetic Programming - on the pro- gramming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press.
Meinhardt, H. 1994. Biological pattern-formation — new observations provide support for theoretical pre- dictions. Bioessays 627–632.
Mitchell, M.; Forrest, S.; and Holland, J. 1991. The royal road for genetic algorithms: Fitness landscapes and GA performance. In Proceedings of the First Eu- ropean Conference on Artificial Life, 245–254. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murray, J. D., and Myerscough, M. R. 1991. Pigmen- tation pattern formation on snakes. J. Theor. Biol. 149:339–360.
Nagumo, J. S.; Arimoto, S.; and Yoshizawa, S. 1962. An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon. Proc. IRE 50:2061–2071.
Sims, K. 1991. Artificial evolution for computer graph- ics. In Computer Graphics (Siggraph ’91 proceedings), 319–328.
Sims, K. 1994. Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition. In Brooks and Maes (1994), 28–39.
Takai, Y.; Takai, N. K.; and Nakamori, K. J. 1998. Ex- ploration of the reaction-diffusion textures. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Modelling and Simulation.
Todd, S., and Latham, W. 1992. Evolutionary Art and Computers. London, San Diego CA: Academic Press. Turing, A. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil Trans R Soc B 237:37–72.
Turk, G. 1991. Generating textures on arbitrary sur- faces using reaction-diffusion. Computer Graphics 25(4):289–298.
Vasiev, B.; Hogeweg, P.; and Panfilov, A. 1994. Sim- ulation of dictyostelium discoideum aggregation via reaction-diffusion model. Physical Review Letters 73:31733176.
Ventrella, J. 1994. Disney meets Darwin. In Brooks and Maes (1994), 436–441.
Links
Full Text
http://alife8.alife.org/proceedings/sub1938.pdf
