Applying theoretical models on human creativity to animal studies
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Applying theoretical models on human creativity to animal studies. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(1), 77-89.
DOI
Abstract
While creativity in humans has been actively studied for some time, it is only recently been a topic of interest in non-human animals. In order to take advantage of what is already known and to avoid redundancy, communication between those who study humans and animals is crucial. There are several models which are actively used in the study of creativity in humans which can be easily applied to animals to assist with the definition, classification, and characterization of behaviors.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Anderson, J. R., & Gallup, G. G. (2011). Which primates recognize themselves in mirrors? PLoS Biology, 9, 1–3. Auersperg, A. M. I., Szabo, B., von Bayern, A. M. P., & Kacelnik, A. (2012). Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo.Current Biology, 22, R903–904. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.002
Ball, G. E., & Hulse, S. H. (1998). Birdsong. American Psychologist, 55, 37–58.
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.
Beran, M. J., & Parrish, A. E. (2012). Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 15, 1085–1094.
Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., & Perdue, B. M. (2013). Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen. Psychological Science, 24, 660–666. doi:10.1177/0956797612458936
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296.
Borgia, G. (1985). Bower quality, number of decorations, and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): An experimental analysis. Animal Behavior, 33, 266–271.
Byrne, R. W., & Byrne, J. M. E. (1993). Complex leaf-gathering skills of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. beringei): Variability and standardization. American Journal of Primatology, 31, 241–261.
Carter, A. J., Goldizen, A., & Heinsohn, R. (2012). Personality and plasticity: Temporal behavioural reaction norms in a lizard, the Namibian rock agama. Animal Behaviour, 84, 471–477.
Carter, A. J., Goldizen, A. W., & Tromp, S. A. (2010). Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: Bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 655–661. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq036
Chamove, A. S., Eysenck, H. J., & Harlow, H. F. (1972). Personality in monkeys: Factor analyses of Rhesus social behavior. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 496–504.
Cole, E. F., Cram, D. L., & Quinn, J. L. (2011). Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Animal Behaviour, 81, 491–498.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 155–161.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2010). Functional creativity: Products and the generation of effective novelty. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Empirical validation of the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale (CSDS). Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 119–137. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, A. C. Graesser, & J. Dunlosky (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–69). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Piazza, P. V. V, Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1993). Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty in rats. Possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 411–418. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90069-F
Dingemanse, N. J., Réale, D., & Reale, D. (2005). Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour, 142, 1159– 1184. doi:10.1163/156853905774539445
Doerr, N. R. (2010). Does decoration theft lead to an honest relationship between male quality and signal size in great bowerbirds? Animal Behaviour, 79, 747–755.
Doerr, N. R. (2012). Male great bowerbirds accumulate decorations to reduce the annual costs of signal production. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1477–1482. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.021
Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(3 Pt 1), 592–598.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231–248.
Fidler, A. E., van Oers, K., Drent, P. J., Kuhn, S., Mueller, J. C., & Kempenaers, B. (2007). Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, 274, 1685–1691. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0337
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ford, C., & Sullivan, D. M. (2004). A time for everything: How timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 163–183.
Freeman, H. D., Brosnan, S. F., Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Developing a comprehensive and comparative questionnaire for measuring personality in chimpanzees using a simultaneous top-down/bottom-up design. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 1042-1053. doi:10.1002/ajp.22168
Gallup, G. G. (1970). Chimpanzees: Self recognition. Science, 167, 86–87.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psycholocial Assessment, 4, 26–42.
Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86.
Greenberg, J. R., Hamann, K., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Chimpanzee helping in collaborative and noncollaborative contexts. Animal Behaviour, 80, 873–880.
Griffin, A. S., Lermite, F., Perea, M., & Guez, D. (2013). To innovate or not: contrasting effects of social groupings on safe and risky foraging in Indian mynahs. Animal Behaviour, 86, 1291-1300.
Griffin, M., & McDermott, M. R. (1998). Exploring a tripartite relationship between rebelliousness,openness to experience, and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 26, 347–356. doi:10.2224/sbp.1998.26.4.347
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Hare, B. A., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.
Herrmann, E., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Call, J., Hare, B. A., & Tomasello, M. (2010). The structure of individual differences in the cognitive abilities of children and chimpanzees. Psychological Science, 21, 102–110. doi:10.1177/0956797609356511
Highfill, L. E., & Kuczaj, S. A. (2007). Do bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) have distinct and stable personalities? Aquatic Mammals, 33, 380–389.
Highfill, L. E., & Kuczaj, S. (2010). How studies of wild and captive dolphins contribute to our understanding of individual differences and personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 269–277.
Hoever, I. J., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982– 996. doi:10.1037/a0029159
Ivcevic, Z., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self-estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144-148.
Iwasaki, S., Watanabe, S., & Fujita, K. (2013). Do pigeons (Columba livia) seek information when they have insufficient knowledge? Animal Cognition, 16, 211–21. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0566-y
Kaufman, A. B., Butt, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Colbert-White, E. N. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 255–272.
Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223–233. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x Animal Behavior and Cognition 2014, 1(1):77-89Kaufman & Kaufman 87
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171–178. doi:10.1080/10400410802059929
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332–340.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.
Kaufman, J. C., & Kaufman, A. B. (2004). Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 143–155. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.006
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley. Kawai, M. (1965). Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet . Primates, 6, 1–30.
Kenward, B., Rutz, C., Weir, A. A. S., & Kacelnik, A. (2006). Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: Inherited action patterns and social influences. Animal Behaviour, 72, 1329–1343. King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.
Kluen, E., Kuhn, S., Kempenaers, B., & Brommer, J. E. (2012). A simple cage test captures intrinsic differences in aspects of personality across individuals in a passerine bird. Animal Behaviour, 84, 279–287.
Krutzen, M., Mann, J., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., Bejder, L., Sherwin, W. B., ... Sherman, W. B. (2005). Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8939–8943. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500232102
Kuczaj, S. A., II, Xitco, M. J., Jr, & Gory, J. D. (2010). Can dolphins plan their behavior? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 664–670.
Kummer, H., & Goodall, J. (1985). Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 308, 203–214.
Kyllonen, P., Walters, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Noncognitive constructs and their assessment in graduate education: A review. Educational Assessment, 10, 153–184. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1003_2
Lefebvre, L. (1995). The opening of milk bottles by birds: Evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behavioral Processes, 34, 43–54.
Liker, A., & Bókony, V. (2009). Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 7893–7898. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900042106
Łopuch, S., & Popik, P. (2011). Cooperative behavior of laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) in an instrumental task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 250-253.
Mann, J., Sargeant, B. L., Watson-Capps, J. J., Gibson, Q. A., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., & Patterson, E. (2008). Why do dolphins carry sponges? PloS One, 3, e3868. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003868
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
McGrew, W. C., & Marchant, L. F. (1999). Laterality of hand use pays off in foraging success for wild chimpanzees. Primates, 4, 509–513.
Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Neumeister, K. L. S. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high- ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 344–365. doi:10.1177/0162353212459257
Morand-Ferron, J., & Quinn, J. L. (2011). Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15898–903. doi:10.1073/pnas.1111560108
Morand-Ferron, J., Sol, D., & Lefebvre, L. (2007). Food stealing in birds: Brain or brawn? Animal Behaviour, 74, 1725–1734. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.031
Osvath, M. (2009). Spontaneous planning for future stone throwing by a male chimpanzee. Current Biology, 90, R90-R91.
Ottoni, E. B., de Resende, B. D., Izar, P., & Resende, B. D. (2005). Watching the best nutcrackers: What capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others’ tool-using skills. Animal Cognition, 24, 215–219. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0245-8
Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Morand-Ferron, J., & Lefebvre, L. (2009). Innovation in groups: Does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? Behaviour, 146, 1543–1546. doi:10.1163/156853909X450131
Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Petrosini, L., Grazianoa, A., Mandolesib, L., Neria, P., Molinari, M., & Leggio, M. G. (2003). Watch how to do it! New advances in learning by observation. Brain Research Reviews, 42, 252–264. doi:10.1016/S0165- 0173(03)00176-0
Plotnik, J. M., Lair, R., Suphachoksahakun, W., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2011). Elephants know when they need a helping trunk in a cooperative task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 5116–21. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101765108
Povinelli, D. J., Eddy, T. J., Hobson, R. P., & Tomasello, M. (1996). What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 1–189.
Pretz, J. E. (2008). Intuition versus analysis: Strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 36, 554–66.
Radmacher, M. A., & Kalloch, L. (2013). She: A celebration of greatness in every woman. Berkeley, CA: Viva Editions.
Reale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., Dingemanse, N. J., & Réale, D. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291–318. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 185X.2007.00010.x
Reiter-Palmon, R., Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (in press). Looking at creativity through a Business- Psychology-Education (BPE) lens: The challenge and benefits of listening to each other. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research handbook. New York: Routledge. Rhodes, M. (1962). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.
Russon, A. E., van Schaik, C. P., Kuncoro, P., Ferisa, A., Handayani, D. P., & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2008). Innovation and intelligence in orangutans. In S. A. Wich, S. S. U. Atmoko, T. M. Setia & C. P. van Schiak (Eds), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 279–299). New York: Oxford University Press.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., & Lewin, R. (1994). Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Sawyer, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 447–469.
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Scarf, D., & Colombo, M. (2009). Eye movements during list execution reveal no planning in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 587–592.
Scarf, D., Danly, E., Morgan, G., Colombo, M., & Terrace, H. S. (2010). Sequential planning in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 14, 317–324. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0365-2
Schel, A. M., Machanda, Z., Townsend, S. W., Zuberbühler, K., & Slocombe, K. E. (2013). Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Animal Behaviour, 86, 955–965.
Simonton, D. K. (1990). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 92–115). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.
Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Uncertainty monitoring and metacognition by animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 19. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00327.x
Stöwe, M., Bugnyar, T., Heinrich, B., Kotrschal, K., & Stowe, M. (2006). Effects of group size on approach to novel objects in ravens (Corvus corax). Ethology, 112, 1079–1088. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01273.x
Terrace, H. S. (1984). Simultaneous chaining: The problem it poses for traditional chaining theory. In R. J. Herrnstein & A. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
Tomasello, M., Davis-DaSilva, M., Camak, L., & Bard, K. (1997). Observational learning of tool use by young chimpanzees. Human Evolution, 2, 175–183.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
Van Oers, K. (2005). Context dependence of personalities: Risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 716–723. doi:10.1093/beheco/ari045
Watanabe, S. (2010). Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. Animal Cognition, 13, 75– 85. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0246-8
Watanabe, S., Sakamoto, J., & Wakita, M. (1995). Pigeons’ discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 165–174.
Weir, A. A. S., Chappell, J., & Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science, 297, 981. doi:10.1126/science.1073433
Weir, A. A. S., & Kacelnik, A. (2006). A New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Animal Cognition, 9, 317–334. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0052-5
White, E. B. (1952). Charlotte’s Web. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Wimpenny, J. H., Weir, A. A. S., & Kacelnik, A. (2011). New Caledonian crows use tools for non-foraging activities. Animal Cognition, 14, 459–64. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0366-1
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310. doi:10.1002/per.409
Yamamoto, S., & Tanaka, M. (2009). Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) spontaneously take turns in a reciprocal cooperation task? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 242–249.
Links
Full Text
http://abc.sciknow.org/archive_files/201401/20140106_kaufman.pdf
