Autonomously Creating Quality Images

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Reference

David Norton, Derrall Heath and Dan Ventura: Autonomously Creating Quality Images. In: Computational Creativity 2011 ICCC 2011, pp. 10-15.

DOI

Abstract

Creativity is an important part of human intelligence, and it is difficult to quantify (or even qualify) creativity in an in- telligent system. Recently it has been suggested that quality, novelty, and typicality are essential properties of a creative system. We describe and demonstrate a computational sys- tem (called DARCI) that is designed to eventually produce images in a creative manner. In this paper, we focus on qual- ity and show, through experimentation and statistical analy- sis, that DARCI is beginning to be able to produce images with quality comparable to those produced by humans.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
author = {David Norton, Derrall Heath and Dan Ventura},
title = {Autonomously Creating Quality Images},
editor = {Dan Ventura, Pablo Gervás, D. Fox Harrell, Mary Lou Maher, Alison Pease and Geraint Wiggins},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2011},
year = {2011},
month = {April},
location = {México City, México},
pages = {10-15},
url = {http://iccc11.cua.uam.mx/proceedings/the_applied/norton_iccc11.pdf, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Autonomously_Creating_Quality_Images },
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}

Used References

Colton, S.; Gow, J.; Torres, P.; and Cairns, P. 2010. Experi- ments in objet trouv ́e browsing. Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Computational Creativity 238–247.

Colton, S. 2008. Creativity versus the perception of creativ- ity in computational systems. Creative Intelligent Systems: Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium 14–20.

Datta, R.; Joshi, D.; Li, J.; and Wang, J. Z. 2006. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational ap- proach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3953:288–301.

De Smedt, T.; De Bleser, F.; and Nijs, L. 2010. Nodebox 2. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Elec- tronic Art (ISEA 2010).

Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.

Gevers, T., and Smeulders, A. 2000. Combining color and shape invariant features for image retrieval. IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing 9:102–119.

King, I. Distributed content-based visual informa- tion retrieval system on peer-to-pear(p2p) network. http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~miplab/discovir/.

Li, C., and Chen, T. 2009. Aesthetic visual quality assess- ment of paintings. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 3:236–252.

Norton, D.; Heath, D.; and Ventura, D. 2010. Establishing appreciation in a creative system. Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Computational Creativity.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing cre- ativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17:67– 99.

Wang, W.-N., and He, Q. 2008. A survey on emotional semantic image retrieval. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing.

Wang, W.-N.; Yu, Y.-L.; and Jiang, S.-M. 2006. Image re- trieval by emotional semantics: A study of emotional space and feature extraction. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 4:3534–3539.


Links

Full Text

http://iccc11.cua.uam.mx/proceedings/the_applied/norton_iccc11.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links