Experiments in Objet Trouve Browsing
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Simon Colton, Jeremy Gow, Pedro Torres, Paul Cairns: Experiments in Objet Trouve Browsing. In: Computational Creativity 2010 ICCC 2010. 238-247.
DOI
Abstract
We report on two experiments to study the use of a graphic design tool for generating and selecting image filters, in which the aes- thetic preferences that the user expresses whilst browsing filtered images drives the filter generation process. In the first experiment, we found ev- idence for the idea that intelligent employment of the user’s preferences when generating filters can improve the overall quality of the designs produced, as assessed by the users themselves. The results also suggest some user behaviours related to the fidelity of the image filters, i.e., how much they alter the image they are applied to. A second experiment tested whether evolutionary techniques which manage fidelity would be preferred by users. Our results did not support this hypothesis, which opens up interesting questions about how user preferences can be intel- ligently employed in browsing-based design tools.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{
author = {Simon Colton, Jeremy Gow, Pedro Torres, Paul Cairns},
title = {Experiments in Objet Trouve Browsing},
editor = {Dan Ventura, Alison Pease, Rafael P ́erez y P ́erez, Graeme Ritchie and Tony Veale},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2010},
year = {2010},
month = {January},
location = {Lisbon, Portugal},
pages = {238-247},
url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2010/papers/colton-et-al.pdf, http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Experiments_in_Objet_Trouve_Browsing },
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}
Used References
1. M Andre, M Schraefel, J Teevan, and S Dumais. Designing for (un)serendipity. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Creativity and Cognition Conference, 2009.
2. S Boyd Davis and M Moar. The amateur creator. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition., 2005.
3. S Colton and P Torres. Evolving approximate image filters. In Proceedings of the Evolutionary Art and Music Workshop, EvoMUSART, 2009.
4. J Gero and M Maher. Mutation and analogy to support creativity in computer-aided design. In Proceedings of CAAD Futures, 1991.
5. P Machado and A Cardoso. NEvAr – The assessment of an evolutionary art tool. In Proc. AISB Symp. on Creative and Cultural Aspects of AI and Cog. Sci., 2000.
6. G Ritchie. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines, 17:67–99, 2007.
7. J Romero and P Machado, editors. The Art of Artificial Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and Music. Springer, 2007.
8. D Schon and G Wiggins. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2):135–156, 1992.
9. B Schneiderman. Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12):20–32, 2007.
10. I Takeshi, O Jun, M Koji, and M Satoshi. Studies on user adaptive browsing system on the internet. SIG-KBS, 43:81–86, 1999.
11. P Torres, S Colton, and S R ̈uger. Experiments in example-based image filter retrieval. In Proceedings of the SAMT Cross-Media Workshop, 2008.
Links
Full Text
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2010/papers/colton-et-al.pdf
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~jgow/papers/iccc10.pdf
