Preference Models for Creative Artifacts and Systems

Aus de_evolutionary_art_org
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Reference

Debarun Bhattacharjya: Preference Models for Creative Artifacts and Systems. In: Computational Creativity 2016 ICCC 2016, 52-59

DOI

Abstract

Although there is vigorous debate around definitions of creativity, there is general consensus that creativity i) has multiple facets, and ii) inherently involves a subjective value judgment by an evaluator. In this paper, we present evaluation of creative artifacts and computational creativity systems through a multiattribute preference modeling lens. Specifically, we introduce the use of multiattribute value functions for creativity evaluation and argue that there are significant benefits to explicitly representing creativity judgments as subjective preferences using formal mathematical models. Various implications are illustrated with the help of examples from and inspired by the creativity literature.

Extended Abstract

Bibtex

@inproceedings{
 author = {Debarun Bhattacharjya},
 title = {Preference Models for Creative Artifacts and Systems},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity},
 series = {ICCC2016},
 year = {2016},
 month = {Jun-July},
 location = {Paris, France},
 pages = {52-59},
 url = {http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Preference-Models-for-Creative-Artifacts-and-Systems.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Preference_Models_for_Creative_Artifacts_and_Systems },
 publisher = {Sony CSL Paris},
}


Used References

Abbas, A. E. 2009. Multiattribute utility copulas. Operations Research 57(6):1367–1383.

Amabile, T. M. 1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43:997–1013.

Belton, V., and Stewart, T. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer.

Boden, M. 1990. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London, UK: Weidenfield and Nicolson Ltd.

Boden, M. 1998. Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 103:347–356.

Buchanan, B. 2001. Creativity at the metalevel. AI Magazine 22(3):13–28.

Cardoso, A.; Veale, T.; and Wiggins, G. A. 2009. Converging on the divergent: The history (and future) of the international joint workshops in computational creativity. AI Magazine 30(3):15–22.

Cattell, J.; Glascock, J.; and Washburn, M. F. 1918. Experiments on a possible test of aesthetic judgment of pictures. American Journal of Psychology 29:333–336.

Colton, S., andWiggins, G. A. 2012. Computational creativity: The final frontier. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 21–26.

Colton, S.; Charnly, J.; and Pease, A. 2011. Computational creativity theory: The FACE and IDEA descriptive models. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC), 90–95.

Colton, S. 2008. Creativity versus the perception of creativity in computational systems. In Proceedings of AAAI Symposium on Creative Systems, 14–20.

Dyer, J. S., and Sarin, R. K. 1979. Measurable multiattribute value functions. Operations Research 27(4):810–822.

F¨urnkranz, J., and H¨ullermeier, E. 2010. Preference Learning. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Jordanous, A. 2012. A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative. Cognitive Computing 4:246–279.

Jordanous, A. 2013. Evaluating computational creativity: A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems and its application. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sussex.

Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York.

Mayer, R. E. 1999. Fifty years of creativity research. In Sternberg, R. J., ed., Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 449–460.

Newell, A.; Shaw, J. C.; and Simon, H. 1958. The processes of creative thinking. Technical Report Report P-1320, The RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California.

Pease, A., and Colton, S. 2011. On impact and evaluation in computational creativity: A discussion of the Turing test and an alternative proposal. In Proceedings of the AISB Convention, 1–8.

Pease, A.; Winterstein, D.; and Colton, S. 2001. Evaluating machine creativity. In Proceedings of Workshop Program of ICCBR-Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in AI and Cognitive Science, 129–137.

Rhodes, M. 1961. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42(7):305–310.

Ritchie, G. 2001. Assessing creativity. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in Arts and Science, 3–11.

Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17:67– 99.

Sawyer, R. K. 2012. Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press.

Sklar, A. 1959. Fonctions de r´epartition `a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Universit´e de Paris 8:229–231.

Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I. 1991. An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development 34(1):1–31.

Sternberg, R. J., and The Rainbow Project Collaborators. 2006. The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence 34:321–350.

Stewart, T. J. 1996. Robustness of additive value function methods in MCDM. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5(4):301–309.

Taylor, C. W. 1988. Approaches to and definitions of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J., ed., The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 99–121.

Varshney, L. R.; Pinel, F.; Varshney, K. R.; Schorgendorfer, A.; and Chee, Y.-M. 2013. Cognition as a part of computational creativity. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC), 36–43.

Ventura, D. 2008. A reductio ad absurdum experiment in sufficiency for evaluating (computational) creative systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, 11–19.

vonWinterfeldt, D., and Edwards,W. 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavorial Research. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Wallenius, J.; Dyer, J. S.; Fishburn, P. C.; Steuer, R. E.; Zionts, S.; and Deb, K. 2008. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science 54(7):1336—1349.

Wiggins, G. A. 2006. Searching for computational creativity. New Generation Computing 24(3):209—222.


Links

Full Text

http://www.computationalcreativity.net/iccc2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Preference-Models-for-Creative-Artifacts-and-Systems.pdf

intern file

Sonstige Links