Aesthetic Evaluation: Automated Fitness Functions for Evolutionary Art, Design, and Music: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „== Reference == Philip Galanter: Aesthetic Evaluation: Automated Fitness Functions for Evolutionary Art, Design, and Music. In: Proceeding of the fifte…“) |
(kein Unterschied)
|
Version vom 6. Januar 2015, 21:20 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Philip Galanter: Aesthetic Evaluation: Automated Fitness Functions for Evolutionary Art, Design, and Music. In: Proceeding of the fifteenth annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion GECCO 2013, 1005-1038.
DOI
Abstract
Computational Aesthetic Evaluation:
Computer systems capable of making normative judgments related to questions of beauty and taste in the arts
Type 1 - Simulate, predict, or cater to human notions of beauty and taste.
Type 2 - Meta-aesthetic exploration of all possible emergent machine aesthetics in a way disconnected from human experience.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
Used References
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye (New, expanded and revised ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bense, M. (1965). Aesthetica; Einführung in die neue Aesthetik. Baden-Baden,: Agis-Verlag.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York,: McGraw-Hill.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York,: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Collier , G.L., Why Does Music Express Only Some Emotions? A Test Of A Philosophical Theory. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2002. 20(1): p. 21-31.
Cooper, J.M. and P.J. Silvia Opposing Art: Rejection As An Action Tendency Of Hostile Aesthetic Emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2009. 27(1): p. 109-126.
Coney , J. and C. Bruce Hemispheric Processes In The Perception Of Art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2004. 22(2): p. 181-200.
Dorin, A. (2005). Enriching Aesthetics with Artificial Life. In A. Adamatzky & M. Komosinski (Eds.), Artificial life models in software (pp. 415-431). London: Springer-Verlag.
Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct : beauty, pleasure, & human evolution (1st U.S. ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Feist , G.J. and T.R. Brady Openness To Experience, Non-Conformity, And The Preference For Abstract Art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2004. 22(1): p. 77-89.
Firstov, V., et al., The Colorimetric Barycenter Of Paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2007. 25(2): p. 209-217.
Galanter, P. (2012). Computational Aesthetic Evaluation: Past and Future. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and Creativity. Berlin: Springer.
Galanter, P. (2010). Complexity, Neuroaesthetics, and Computational Aesthetic Evaluation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Generative Art, Milan, Italy.
Galanter, P. (2003). What is Generative Art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory. Paper presented at the International Conference on Generative Art, Milan, Italy.
Galanter, P. (2012 in press). Computational Aesthetic Evaluation: Past and Future. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and Creativity. Berlin: Springer. (see http://philipgalanter.com for a copy)
Gell-Mann, M., & Lloyd, S. (1996). Information measures, effective complexity, and total information. Complexity, 2(1), 44-52.
Giannini, A.M. and P. Bonaiuto, Special Image Contents, Personality Features, And Aesthetic Preferences. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2003. 21(2): p. 143-154.
Glette, K., Torresen, J., & Yasunaga, M. (2007). An Online EHW Pattern Recognition System Applied to Face Image Recognition Applications of Evolutionary Computing (pp. 271-280): Springer.
Greenfield, G. R. (2008). Co-evolutionary Methods in Evolutionary Art. In J. Romero & P. Machado (Eds.), The Art Of Artificial Evolution (pp. 357-380): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hawkins, J. and Blakeslee, S. (2004). On intelligence, 1st edn, Times Books, New York.
Jacobsen , T., & Höfel, L. (2001). Aesthetics Electrified: An Analysis Of Descriptive Symmetry And Evaluative Aesthetic Judgment Processes Using Event-Related Brain Potentials. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(2), 14.
Oelmann, H. and B. Laeng, The emotional meaning of harmonic intervals. Cognitive Processing, 2009. 10(2): p. 113-131.
Katz, B.F., Color Contrast And Color Preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1999. 17(1): p. 1-24.
Koob, A. (2009). The Root of Thought: What Do Glial Cells Do? Mind Matters Retrieved 11/29/09, 2009, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-root-of-thought-what
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems in Information Transmission, 1, 1-7.
Koneni, V.J., Does music induce emotion? A theoretical and methodological analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2008. 2(2): p. 115-129.
Kozbelt, A., Dynamic Evaluation Of Matisse’s 1935 Large Reclining Nude. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2006. 24(2): p. 119-137.
Latto, R. and K. Russell-Duff, An Oblique Effect In The Selection Of Line Orientation By Twentieth Century Painters. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2002. 20(1): p. 49-60.
Locher, P., et al., Artists’ Use Of Compositional Balance For Creating Visual Displays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2001. 19(2): p. 213-227.
Machotka, P., Artistic Styles And Personalities: A Close View And A More Distant View. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2006. 24(1): p. 71-80.
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse : the predictability of artistic change. New York, N.Y.: BasicBooks.
Martindale, C., Moore, K. and Borkum, J. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for berlyne’s psychobiological theory, The American Journal of Psychology 103(1): 53–80.
Martindale, C. (1991). Cognitive psychology : a neural-network approach, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California.
Martindale, C. (2007). A neural-network theory of beauty, in C. Martindale, P. Locher and V. Petrov (eds), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, Bay- wood, Amityville, N.Y., pp. 181–194.
McCormack, J., & Bown, O. (2009). Life's What You Make: Niche Construction and Evolutionary Art. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the EvoWorkshops 2009 on Applications of Evolutionary Computing.
Moles, A. A. (1966). Information theory and esthetic perception. Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Parker, S., et al., Positive and negative hedonic contrast with musical stimuli. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2008. 2(3): p. 171-174.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct (1st ed.). New York, NY: W. Morrow and Co.
Polzella, D.J., S.H. Hammar, and C.W. Hinkle, The Effect Of Color On Viewers’ Ratings Of Paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2005. 23(2): p. 153-163.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987): Flocks, herds, schools. A distributed behavioural model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25-34.
Rob Saunders, John S Gero: Curious agents and situated design evaluations. AI EDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. 18, 2, 153-161. http://cs.gmu.edu/~jgero/publications/2004/04SaundersGeroAIEDAM.pdf
Schimmel, K. and J. Forster, How temporal distance changes novices' attitudes towards unconventional arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2008. 2(1): p. 53-60.
Schmidhuber, J. (2012 in press). A Formal Theory of Creativity to Model the Creation of Art. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and Creativity. Berlin: Springer.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379--423.
Simonton, D.K., Film music: Are award-winning scores and songs heard in successful motion pictures? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2007. 1(2): p. 53-60.
Smith, L.F., et al., Effects Of Time And Information On Perception Of Art*. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2006. 24(2): p. 229-242.
Todd, P. M., & Werner, G. M. (1998). Frankensteinian Methods for Evolutionary Music Composition. In N. Griffith & P. M. Todd (Eds.), Musical networks: Parallel distributed perception and performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Urbano, P. (2006). Consensual paintings. Applications Of Evolutionary Computing, Proceedings, 3907, 622-632.
Watanabe , S. (2009). Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. [10.1007/s10071-009-0246-8]. Animal Cognition, 13(1).
Watanabe S (2001) Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons. Animal Cognition 4:147–151
Links
Full Text
http://philipgalanter.com/downloads/gecco_2013_with_notes.pdf Presentation Slides
