Specific curiosity as a cause and consequence of transformational creativity
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Reference
Kazjon Grace and Mary Lou Maher: Specific curiosity as a cause and consequence of transformational creativity. In: Computational Creativity 2015 ICCC 2015, 260-267.
DOI
Abstract
This paper describes a framework by which creative systems can intentionally exhibit transformational creativity. Intentions are derived from surprising events in a process based on specific curiosity. We argue that autonomy of intent is achieved when a creative system directs its generative processes based on knowledge learnt from within its creative domain, and develop a framework to elaborate this behaviour. The framework describes ways that transformation of the creative domain can arise: from learning, from a serendipitous situation, and as a result of intentional exploration. Examples of each of these kinds of transformation are then illustrated through examples in the domain of recipes.
Extended Abstract
Bibtex
@inproceedings{
author = {Grace, Kazjon and Maher, Mary Lou},
title = {Specific curiosity as a cause and consequence of transformational creativity},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity},
series = {ICCC2015},
year = {2015},
month = {Jun},
location = {Park City, Utah, USA},
pages = {260-267},
url = {http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/11_3Grace.pdf http://de.evo-art.org/index.php?title=Specific_curiosity_as_a_cause_and_consequence_of_transformational_creativity },
publisher = {International Association for Computational Creativity},
keywords = {computational, creativity},
}
Used References
Baldi, P., and Itti, L. 2010. Of bits and wows: a bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention. Neural Networks 23(5):649–666.
Berlyne, D. E. 1966. Curiosity and exploration. Science 153(3731):25–33.
Best, D. 1981. Intentionality and art. Philosophy 56(217):349–363.
Boden, M. A. 2003. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge.
Charnley, J.; Pease, A.; and Colton, S. 2012. On the notion of framing in computational creativity. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Creativity, 77–82.
Cohn, D. A.; Ghahramani, Z.; and Jordan, M. I. 1996. Active learning with statistical models. Journal of artificial intelligence research.
Cross, N. 2004. Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies 25(5):427–441.
Cully, A.; Clune, J.; and Mouret, J.-B. 2014. Robots that can adapt like natural animals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3501. Dewey, J. 2005. Art as experience. Penguin.
Gebser, M.; Kaufmann, B.; and Schaub, T. 2009. Solution enumeration for projected boolean search problems. In Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Springer. 71–86.
Getzels, J.W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1976. The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. Wiley New York.
Goldschmidt, G. 1991. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity research journal 4(2):123–143.
Grace, K., and Maher, M. L. 2014. What to expect when youre expecting: the role of unexpectedness in computationally evaluating creativity. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Creativity, to appear.
Grace, K.; Maher, M.; Fisher, D.; and Brady, K. 2014. A data-intensive approach to predicting creative designs based on novelty, value and surprise. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation (Ahead of Print).
Grace, K.; Gero, J.; and Saunders, R. 2015. Interpretationdriven mapping: a framework for conducting search and rerepresentation in parallel for computational analogy in design. AI EDAM 29(2):185–201. Jennings, K. E. 2010. Developing creativity: Artificial barriers in artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines 20(4):489– 501. Kelly, N., and Gero, J. S. 2014. Interpretation in design: modelling how the situation changes during design activity. Research in Engineering Design 25(2):109–124.
Krzeczkowska, A.; El-Hage, J.; Colton, S.; and Clark, S. 2010. Automated collage generation-with intent. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on computational creativity, 20.
Lawson, B. 2006. How designers think: the design process demystified. Routledge.
Liapis, A.; Martınez, H. P.; Togelius, J.; and Yannakakis, G. N. 2013. Transforming exploratory creativity with delenox. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity, 56–63.
Macedo, L., and Cardoso, A. 2001. Modeling forms of surprise in an artificial agent. Structure 1(C2):C3.
Merrick, K., and Maher, M. 2009. Motivated reinforcement learing.
Morris, R. G.; Burton, S. H.; Bodily, P. M.; and Ventura, D. 2012. Soup over bean of pure joy: Culinary ruminations of an artificial chef. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Creativity, 119–125.
Newell, A.; Shaw, J.; and Simon, H. A. 1959. The processes of creative thinking. Rand Corporation.
Ortony, A., and Partridge, D. 1987. Surprisingness and expectation failure: what’s the difference? In Proceedings of the 10th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence-Volume 1, 106–108. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Ritchie, G. 2001. Assessing creativity. In Proc. of AISB01 Symposium.
Saunders, R., and Gero, J. S. 2001. Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney 113–139.
Saunders, R. 2011. Artificial creative systems and the evolution of language. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity, 36–41.
Saunders, R. 2012. Towards autonomous creative systems: A computational approach. Cognitive Computation 4(3):216–225.
Schmidhuber, J. 2010. Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990–2010). Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on 2(3):230–247.
Schon, D. A., and Wiggins, G. 1992. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design studies 13(2):135–156.
Sch¨on, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, volume 5126. Basic books.
Smith, A. M., and Mateas, M. 2011. Knowledge-level creativity in game design. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference in Computational Creativity (ICCC 2011).
Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I. 1999. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity 1:3–15.
Suwa, M.; Gero, J.; and Purcell, T. 1999. Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: A key to creative designs. Computational Models of Creative Design IV, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 297–320.
Varshney, L. R.; Pinel, F.; Varshney, K. R.; Bhattacharjya, D.; Schoergendorfer, A.; and Chee, Y.-M. 2013. A big data approach to computational creativity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.1213.
Weisberg, R. W. 1993. Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. WH Freeman New York.
Wiggins, G. A. 2006. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(7):449–458.
Links
Full Text
http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/11_3Grace.pdf
